ipapikas

5 ms·

1.
by ipapikas 10y ago
Ok, maybe the initial position, mentioning endorsements, was very strict. A tool, maybe in your case is a development or design tool, can become a generic skill. It is common to get a rating/review for something that it's not that
2.
by ipapikas 10y ago
That's we are trying to solve, the underlying idea. It's broken because it's based on what you just described. But, getting a rating (or an endorsement) from a stranger, it won't affect you really (it won't always g
3.
Show HN: Improving LinkedIn endorsements using graph connections and weights(ratein.io)
3 points by ipapikas 10y ago|4 comments
4.
by ipapikas 11y ago
1) You have a point. One 'Who we are' section coming up. :) 2) If you mean you have 1000 users across all websites you could create a different account for each of them. We know this might become a pain to manage so we are plannin
5.
by ipapikas 11y ago
We have in mind that username can be a lot of things including email, a unique username or even a phone number. It depends on the approach but definitely under consideration in order to improve. Thanks!
6.
by ipapikas 11y ago
It's a lot to do and think right now (as always for this kind of service) and we have to focus on making our uptime trustworthy and our architecture solid! This is just our first draft of our page and the loginBox demo is on its way th
7.
by ipapikas 11y ago
It's only our first draft and it's natural to have similarities. You can expect big changes and improvements in the future! As our first landing page for the product, we have to redesign a lot of things and this is exactly why we
8.
by ipapikas 11y ago
Thanks a lot! We will do our best to provide a valuable product and hopefully you'll decide to come and work with us in the future! ;-)
9.
by ipapikas 11y ago
Thanks for letting us know! We will fix those links as soon as we have the documents ready. We just added a more explanatory text!
10.
by ipapikas 11y ago
We'll change the background soon. Thanks for letting us know. As for subresource integrity, it's in our plans for future versions. Right now we are focusing on making our main features as secure as possible.
11.
by ipapikas 11y ago
Thanks for the comment! At the moment we are focusing on frontend and mobile so we have to be able to access the authentication tokens from the javascript. However, localStorage is an option we are currently exploring to use instead of cook
12.
by ipapikas 11y ago
As we replied to a previous comment, we just launched the website and we are getting our certificate right now. However, the underlying api is on HTTPS. ;-)
13.
by ipapikas 11y ago
We just launched the website and we are getting our certificate right now. However, the underlying api is on HTTPS. ;-)
14.
by ipapikas 11y ago
What we actually meant is that Multi-Factor Authentication is the same as Two-Factor Authentication but with multiple options for the second step. We are going to fix it ASAP to avoid confusion. Thanks a lot for bringing this to our attenti
15.
by ipapikas 11y ago
We don't know why this is happening and we are on it. Meanwhile please try a different browser! Thanks!
16.
by ipapikas 11y ago
We think that those two areas can be connected and it will very valuable for SaaS startups. We were thinking about the generosity for our pricing plan, we are considering increasing the prices for the premium and enterprise plans. Thanks a
17.
Show HN: LoginBox – Authentication, payments and memberships from a single box(loginbox.io)
53 points by ipapikas 11y ago|46 comments
18.
by ipapikas 11y ago
We target desktop versions so we have designed the site accordingly. We are currently updating it for the mobile version as well! Thanks a lot!!
19.
Show HN: Drov.io – plug-and-play user authentication and management platform(drov.io)
15 points by ipapikas 11y ago|2 comments