intertextuality

14 ms·

91.
by intertextuality 7y ago
That's where you just say "hi", regardless. Chat is transient. When I go online in Discord I don't read up the last few messages unless there's a particularly interesting discussion going on.
92.
by intertextuality 7y ago
> I find it pretentious that anybody could consider the following features "having fun while pretending to communicate" straw-man argument. Nobody considers these things to be frivolous. I would consider slack's annoying g
93.
by intertextuality 7y ago
Are you suggesting "dumbass idiot 𓅩" with a bio of "shut the fuck hi" is a completely serious account? It's fairly obvious that it's a tongue-in-cheek joke, the linked url doesn't even work.
94.
by intertextuality 7y ago
Classes do suffice if you follow the convention of "small, atom-like css classes". I personally hate this style and prefer compositional css classes for a component or a structured object.
95.
by intertextuality 7y ago
That still doesn't account for mixins, which turn out to be very handy. Some examples here.[0] [0]: https://css-tricks.com/custom-user-mixins/ These are preferable because you can compose them as needed for elemen
96.
by intertextuality 7y ago
Using a find and replace instead of a variable holder is extremely bad practice. I should not have to copy/paste my site’s brand colors every time. The original reason I switched was for nested structures so I could stop repeating myse
97.
by intertextuality 7y ago
Although not exactly aesthetically pleasing, I actually prefer the 1. 1. 1. layout. Why? Because when you write something it's common to revise and re-order things. A lot. Having 1. 2. 3. means I'd have to go and fix the rest of t
98.
by intertextuality 7y ago
Sure. But in order to see all sides of the argument and make an informed decision, one should read at least a few different sources, no?
99.
by intertextuality 7y ago
Forget the usb-c dongle issues, my main concern is the magsafe lock. How could something so fundamental like that be removed?
100.
by intertextuality 7y ago
That's a commonly used design though. Putting integrations above the standard form itself. Many forms do this with Paypal integration instead of Apple Pay.
101.
by intertextuality 7y ago
> Mac OS X only works for this due to herculean community efforts. For programming, yes, although I don't know if brew would be called "herculean". For battery life and ease of use, no. I've setup BSD on linux on pers
102.
by intertextuality 7y ago
Your opinions should not be swayed by one article. Have some resolve in what you do. Git is great. It also has issues. Scaling has issues. Changing a tool won't solve scaling issues. Anecdotally I think submodules work just fine, altho
103.
by intertextuality 7y ago
But if it were, you would be okay in justifying a company using slavery as long as they're "successful". Got it. So now all we have to do is make working "crunch hours" for months illegal, since you don't have
104.
by intertextuality 7y ago
Using your own logic, a company could justify slavery in order to deliver the best product. Software can be made without forcing people to work insane hours. Other sectors of the programming field accomplish this, yet games companies are so
105.
by intertextuality 7y ago
It is unreasonable to force developers to increase their level of effort. Manage adequately, hire more people if necessary. There are other solutions that going "welp, we're successful, better work even more hours now".
106.
by intertextuality 7y ago
Game companies can become successful without ridiculous "crunch hours". Game companies can become successful without abusing programmers who are passionate about making games.
107.
by intertextuality 7y ago
I love the downvotes for suggesting unionization. Very nice, HN.
108.
by intertextuality 7y ago
Fault on me for wording it that way. 1) How are you going to earn a profit ? Like what is your revenue stream going to be, etc? Not funding. 2) Why do you need an office in downtown San Francisco? Why not work remotely?
109.
by intertextuality 7y ago
Then submit that to HN, showcasing what wapm can really do. Instead, people here are rightly cynical. I do not want another private company managing something as fundamental as a package registry. I want them to answer my question about h
110.
by intertextuality 7y ago
Sigh. There is a difference between architectural design (namespacing) , and funding income . I am -not- discussing the software architecture of rubygems here, please don't start a bikeshed with that. Rubygems is a shining example of
111.
by intertextuality 7y ago
How are you going to make money? How are you going to fund offices in CA + developers + the operating costs of the registry? I really don’t think a private entity should be running a registry. Ruby is just about the only example of a regist
112.
by intertextuality 7y ago
I'm not OP, I'm GP. Second, I fully understand git, github, gitlab, etc. I'm specifically discussing a situation wherein someone has uploaded non-licensed code to github. I am not advocating for this. I am discussing what sho
113.
by intertextuality 7y ago
> Not to mention having to delay an update notification daily on my Mac. I don't understand this. Windows is "dragged over the coals" for forcing updates at the worst times. Why? Because no one ever updates willingly, the
114.
by intertextuality 7y ago
I understand how git works. I'm discussing the edge case scenario where someone uploads something but doesn't add a license. In that case, forking and cloning should be disabled, at the least.
115.
by intertextuality 7y ago
The two aren't necessarily mutually exclusive, although yes I would agree with you. -In the case- of a repository being public without a license however, forking and related things should still be disabled to prevent licensing headache
116.
by intertextuality 7y ago
Obviously such an implementation would disable cloning as well.
117.
by intertextuality 7y ago
> If you set your pages and repositories to be viewed publicly, you grant each User of GitHub a nonexclusive, worldwide license to use, display, and perform Your Content through the GitHub Service and to reproduce Your Content solely on
118.
by intertextuality 7y ago
There's little difference in using "why turning on http/2 (is/was) a mistake". Is is stronger, but both imply that there is/was something wrong with it, to the point of writing an article about it. A better tit
119.
by intertextuality 7y ago
I believe this is a big problem with git or any of the current repo gui providers. A repository should not be able to be forked if it doesn't have a SPDIX license. Or at the very least users should be able to turn off forking ability i
120.
by intertextuality 7y ago
"refactor: changed stdout statements" is a useless commit message. I should not have to manually open the commit to find out what was actually changed. The message should specify changed X to a. If it's too long, that'

More ›