interestingcpp

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by interestingcpp 9y ago

   It may have been working fine, and he simply chose to pivot careers rather than scale what he had.
2. 2.▲
   by interestingcpp 9y ago

   Well, they’re just ad providers, and plenty of people invest in nth tier ad providers.
3. 3.▲
   by interestingcpp 9y ago

   Why would you care? Well the complexity makes tooling difficult, the engineers expensive, and arguably ongoing development could be slower depending on how many c++ features they have to deal with in one code unit. Are these any strikes aga
4. 4.▲
   by interestingcpp 9y ago

   Simplifying every day usage is entirely a different thing than simplifying the language. I’m not denying the inprovement in usage, just that you should expect the complexity of the language to continually increase because that’s the needs o
5. 5.▲
   by interestingcpp 9y ago

   It seems like this is itself a demonstration there are alternative techniques.
6. 6.▲
   by interestingcpp 9y ago

   Interesting; i think it’s fairly clear by now engaging with C++ is not going to lead to reduced complexity at all. When was the last time it removed support for a feature? That’s not what the language needs because it’s more interested in p