integration

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by integration 8y ago

   Unless someone is starving, spending more on food as income rises is discretionary. A proper food budget is stable, it should not change as someone earns more money. As someone who ate well on minimum wage, you’re not going to convince me l
2. 2.▲
   by integration 8y ago

   Does “disrespectful” instead of “offensive” satisfy your need to play semantics?
3. 3.▲
   by integration 8y ago

   It’s a better definition of luxuries. If someone is spending more on food, clothing, electronics as their income rise those things are clearly discretionary.
4. 4.▲
   by integration 8y ago

   40% of America’s lowest-income families’ consumption goes to luxuries. The bigger problem is American’s terrible spending habits not lack of real income. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.marketwatch.com/amp&#x
5. 5.▲
   by integration 8y ago

   Maybe you don’t realize but this name is offensive to Buddhists... It’s like an insurance company calling itself “Gospel”
6. 6.▲
   by integration 8y ago

   Forgive my ignorance, but isn’t it true that we don’t know what elementary particles are made of? In other words, doesn’t it appear that matter is both continuous and discrete, and that we could concievably find particles that comprise elem