int0x80

26 ms·

211.
by int0x80 9y ago
So you run on ARM just to do x86 emulation? How does it work?
212.
by int0x80 9y ago
I'm assuming the former, but I could be wrong.
213.
by int0x80 9y ago
I'm sorry but the implementation of the speculative execution or the branch predictors was not available at all. Could you tell for example that AMD wasn't vulnerable to meltdown but Intel was by looking at any docs? Not really.
214.
by int0x80 9y ago
I really don't think that the speculative execution _implementation_ was in any spec whatsoever. The fact that it did the protection domain check later in the process was not documented by Intel at all for example. Having said that, th
215.
by int0x80 9y ago
I think I didn't explain myself. What you say is true, but even if your program doesn't see any input, you can (the kernel n_tty line discipline) edit the input (delete it). So if I do print() read() print() read() the reads will
216.
by int0x80 9y ago
Thanks, it makes sense now. So with every `read' to the tty it starts a new edit buffer, I pressume?
217.
by int0x80 9y ago
It does, thank you very much!
218.
by int0x80 9y ago
One thing that I don't rn see is why when I have: printf(">"); read(0, ...); I can only delete (DEL) chars that I've written, but not the ">". Who takes care of that, given that is not using rea
219.
by int0x80 9y ago
which unix is he using and where is that src code? Is it (freely) available?
220.
by int0x80 9y ago
There are not saying it explicitly, which they should.
221.
by int0x80 9y ago
>Gamers and compute-oriented workloads won't be hurt hardly at all. Actually KPTI doesn't only affect syscall but also interrupts. It makes interrups slower, which affects every workload.
222.
by int0x80 10y ago
wow, yeah, that's totally and obviously buggy ...
223.
by int0x80 10y ago
Yeah. I'm totally smelling Commie plot right there. :P
224.
by int0x80 10y ago
this days, almost every failure can be related in some way to a "computing glitch".
225.
by int0x80 10y ago
Right now, this thread!!
226.
by int0x80 10y ago
Yep, I was complaining a bit of the move to systemd. To run a binary (that acts as a daemon in the end) with no especial handling needed by the OS and nothing fancy (just run at runlevel 3, I don't even need a "clean" shutdow
227.
by int0x80 10y ago
Well, to start a init.d service you only really need an executable and a few links to rc.X. Nothing more. I know about the lsb stuff and that but only gives a few warnings if you omit it. Still works as expected out of the box. For example,
228.
by int0x80 10y ago
So, obviously systemd has also taken over crontab? My god ... Really this is sick. I've to fight systemd to do some dead simple init.d custom services and it was awful. Even the process resource limits had to be setup in the sytemd con
229.
by int0x80 10y ago
> Don't care enough I wouldn't blame this too much on laziness but on incompetence.
230.
by int0x80 10y ago
Man, this thread is unreadable without comment-collapse.
231.
by int0x80 10y ago
This. First of all, he should define what "infrastructure software" he is refering to. He mostly talks about OpenStack, AWS ... "services". But it is obviously not only that. It is low level libraries (C lib), compilers,
232.
by int0x80 10y ago
Good luck!
233.
by int0x80 10y ago
Yep, TSLA taking a heavy dip. -11% right now. It might as well be a good time to get in.
234.
by int0x80 10y ago
That's no Moon.
235.
by int0x80 10y ago
When you do `smthin | less' the other bazilion options are loaded in less, using resources. If you want to have a quick look a the help you can get overwhelmed by all the information. Having so many options in less can be seen as over-
236.
by int0x80 10y ago
One could say that if a pager needs +1k lines of help, something is wrong. Complexity is usually not good. And never free.
237.
by int0x80 10y ago
I think a similar example of evolution of tech going wild is the web.
238.
by int0x80 10y ago
It has a ridiculously big help section. It is a pager!
239.
by int0x80 10y ago
Ohh shut up and take my money! Really. If you sold them (for a reasonable price) I would totally buy one.
240.
by int0x80 10y ago
Yes ... I think that should not be allowed (bring down the machine by a non-root user process). In Linux CPU_GROUPS/MEM_GROUPS can help, and the fair scheduler has improved the situation a bit from the old days where a fork bomb will b

More ›