input_sh

21 ms·

391.
by input_sh 11mo ago
Definitely not by asking a non-deterministic tool to do it for you.
392.
by input_sh 11mo ago
Basically already solved = you've never used it for any of those purposes and have no idea if or how well would they work?
393.
by input_sh 11mo ago
You don't have to imagine anything, Microsoft also takes 30% of every purchase made via Microsoft Store.
394.
by input_sh 11mo ago
Considering you're over here deflecting from calling someone doing a nazi salute a nazi... yes, it's safe to say our definitions vary widely.
395.
by input_sh 11mo ago
Yes, if I see a video (not a still) of someone doing a nazi salute two times in a row, I'm gonna assume they're a nazi. Absolutey no disagreements with you there. Doubly so if they also happen to tune into an AfD and a Tommy Robin
396.
by input_sh 11mo ago
Or they have eyes and ears and have seen the footage.
397.
by input_sh 11mo ago
Those used to be called "instant answers" before every search engine renamed them to "AI overviews".
398.
by input_sh 11mo ago
You could easily test your hypothesis yourself. It's not gonna work very well.
399.
by input_sh 11mo ago
> The United States honors international IP law May I introduce you to a somewhat recent concept people like to call AI.
400.
by input_sh 11mo ago
Sure thing bud. Thank you for your well thought out counter-argument.
401.
by input_sh 11mo ago
What exactly did they hijack? They used it like any other user.
402.
by input_sh 11mo ago
It's not the only thing the tool does, as they also publish that regurgitation publicly . You can see it, I can see it without even having a Kagi account. That makes it very much not an on-demand tool, it makes it something much wors
403.
by input_sh 11mo ago
https://news.kagi.com/world/latest Where's the part where you ask them to do this? Is this not something they do automatically? Are they not contributing to the slop by republishing slopified versions of articles
404.
by input_sh 11mo ago
The same company that slopifies news stories in their previous big "feature"? The irony.
405.
by input_sh 11mo ago
Gee golly, really!? Thanks for letting me know, I had no idea! I could've also mentioned Ackman personally calling Trump in 2020 to beg him to shut down the economy for a month and my argument would be just the same: I don't want
406.
by input_sh 11mo ago
Oh they track that, it's in their API as the "instrumentalness" score: https://developer.spotify.com/documentation/web-api/referenc... The fact that they don't do anything with that information
407.
by input_sh 11mo ago
No it hasn't? At all? https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/d...
408.
by input_sh 11mo ago
Who do you think is responsible for such a dysfunctional government? Is it your average working class person earning about $65k/year or is it billionaires that can throw unfathomable amounts of money at any topic of their interest with
409.
by input_sh 11mo ago
To whom? To "charities" owned by other billionaires such as Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and those owned by his children. I don't want billionaires to donate anything, I don't want them to use their money to shape
410.
by input_sh 11mo ago
I agree wholeheartedly, at best I want a "smarter" search bar where I don't have to guess the exact wording of what I'm looking for, but the reply should still be a verbatim quote from the docs, not something regurgitate
411.
by input_sh 11mo ago
Unfortunately no, they run 9.9.9.10, which is without "malware" blocking and without DNSSEC.
412.
by input_sh 11mo ago
Not that I disagree with the premise, but this is such a trash "article" by a self-described fashion designer that promises to "show the receipts" and then doesn't back up any of the claims.
413.
by input_sh 11mo ago
No, she moved there some months after her boyfriend Ben Collins became the CEO of The Onion, which is headquartered in Chicago. This is very easy to verify, they're not secretive about their relationship.
414.
by input_sh 11mo ago
Right click on the icon → remove. The same goes for right clicking on the page → ask AI → remove.
415.
by input_sh 11mo ago
Meta doesn't know anything, the last successful "product" that they built (as opposed to buying) was splitting off Messenger into a separate app. Since then, they invested heavily in providing free internet that failed (Free
416.
by input_sh 11mo ago
I love the idea behind it and the visualisation indeed looks awesome, but the RA data behind it is messy to say the least. For example, 3/7 "nightclubs" it lists in Croatia are not nightclubs. I would also group Kalypso and Z
417.
by input_sh 11mo ago
Come on, pre-Elon you could click on a Twitter link and read the entire thread as well as the replies, now you just get a single tweet with no context above/below. And if you click on an account you just get top posts of all time inste
418.
by input_sh 11mo ago
I don't think this would even make it into top 10 good reasons to stop using Twitter.
419.
by input_sh 11mo ago
Because they're unpaid volunteers that spent a good chunk of their free time working on something and then something changes in its governance which makes them no longer feel valued? How is that difficult to comprehend?
420.
by input_sh 11mo ago
I posted an investigation done by a group of professional journalists, you posted an anonymous HN comment leading to another anonymous HN comment which says "it's NSA actually". Just to make it a full circle, the author of th

More ›