inpoiun

7 ms·

1.
by inpoiun 17y ago
Blocking Google from their sites isn't the end point - this is just a step in a campaign against net neutrality by somebody that owns a lot of cable companies/ ISPs and content providers.
2.
by inpoiun 17y ago
Isn't that the point though? The host receives a DMCA request and take down the content, they are perfectly safe (safe harbor provision etc) You (the author) come along and say, no it isn't illegal - please put it back up. If they put it
3.
by inpoiun 17y ago
> immediately file a counter-notice and your content should be immediately... No, because by putting your content back up the host is opening themselves to liability if it turns out you are wrong. Nobody is going to do that >sue the
4.
by inpoiun 17y ago
True, the best way would be to have OS support for automatic quarantining of anything from outside until it has been checked. Vista sort of has this but it doesn't clear the suspicion, so if you download a simple utility (or even a help fil
5.
by inpoiun 17y ago
It's nothing to do with Google and search. Murdoch sells a lot of cable TV, with Cable TV i have to buy packages - if i want the expensive movie package I have to buy the basic service, then the advanced service then the crappy movie packag
6.
by inpoiun 17y ago
Why do you need real time scanning? You download an app/email attachment etc, check it and then install/open it.
7.
by inpoiun 17y ago
>Any 'good' application is only going to do certain sorts of actions Like delete files, read files, contact websites, read keyb, send email? There might also be naughty reasons to do these things