Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
inimino
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
62 ms
·
601.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
> more quickly than would be appropriate given such probability distribution model. As humans we have much sharper priors over hypothesis space than what we can easily model, which probably explains this discrepancy.
602.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
It's not. The first paragraph mentions an earlier discovered exploit for Chrome, and the rest is about a Windows 0-day that was also used in the same attack.
603.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
> terrible people Shaming someone for a specific vote on a specific bill (taken out of context; surely you're aware that people vote against bills for all kinds of reasons) and "terrible people" and bringing up the KKK is
604.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
One of my favorite things about the book was that that detail was left out.
605.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
The point is that it cannot be.
606.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
Yes, any additional domain you request to has a non-negligible chance of killing the entire connection. To GP, noticing that one request works once from a server (not a home or mobile connection) really means nothing. Every ISP has differen
607.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
There are still orders of magnitude more pages of HTML than Markdown, so if you're interested in archival, just store simple HTML. I'd say HTML has a good chance of being interpretable a thousand years from now.
608.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
And that's where they are not banned. Many pages simply won't load at all in the PRC because someone thought a Google analytics tracker or a hosted library should load before the content (which then never does).
609.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
Where is someone generations hence going to get the hash from?
610.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
I believe the point was collective action of citizens leading to governmental action to enforce corporate action.
611.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
There is a difference between individual action leading to social change (such as political activism or civil disobedience) and individual action that makes the individual feel better and satisfies the need to "do something" while
612.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
There is strong anecdotal evidence that some people are affected by it. However few, or however small the effect size, it is not strictly the same thing as known zero risk.
613.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
The bias of the partial information matters.
614.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
Running a compiler as root in general is not recommended. It's the principle of least privilege. Running without unnecessary privileges is a good idea for the same reason running in a sandbox is a good idea.
615.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
In a container or not, running a compiler-as-a-service as root is never the right way to run a compiler-as-a-service.
616.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
Well, no. That is the same kind of error as Zeno's paradox. One assigns a prior to a class of hypotheses, and the cardinality of that set does not change the total probability you assign to the entire hypothesis class. If one instead a
617.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
Domains are not case sensitive, but email local parts are! There is no reason whatsoever to do case normalization on local parts of emails on any domain you do not own, as this is strictly incorrect and could lead to a totally different add
618.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
You're right, but people tend to have strong priors one way of the other, often unconsciously. This is one of those classic cases where people with strong, divergent priors will disagree more strongly after seeing the same evidence. So
619.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
Any chaotic system (highly sensitive to initial conditions) is practically uncomputable for us, because we have neither the computational power nor the ability to measure the initial conditions sufficiently accurately. Whether there is some
620.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
> If my agreeableness is 1, what does that do? Obviously, there is an entire literature that measures what it does in terms of life outcomes other than questionnaires. If you'd like to learn something very elementary about a field y
621.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
If I understand your comment correctly, "deciding whether a particular algorithm ..." means an arbitrary algorithm. For a specific algorithm, of course sometimes it is possible to prove that it halts for every input. It's onl
622.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
And yet, if your arm was broken, I bet you'd see a doctor. An IP disagreement with an employer is an acute, not a chronic condition. When you don't have years to acquire the knowledge yourself, you go talk to someone who already h
623.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
Actually it does. While it's logically possible, evidence for a hypothesis A is still provided by any data that is more likely under hypothesis A than under hypothesis B. The hypothesis that the mind is computable but is using heuris
624.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
If the mind were found to be uncomputable, I think you'd find vastly more physicists would take that as evidence the universe is uncomputable than that the mind is nonphysical.
625.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
> It’s pretty clear you have no legal position. Nothing about that is clear without knowing the relevant laws of wherever this is, the contract, the circumstances of development, and who knows what else. This is why legal advice from ran
626.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
Asking about something in a weird indirect way is worse on all counts. Just ask directly if open source contribution is encouraged or allowed. If it isn't, and you still want to work there anyway, no company that's remotely decent
627.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
The best way to not "go the legal route" is to find out what is legally open to you and what is not, and then negotiate from confidence rather than ignorance. Failing to do legal homework up front is actually an easy way to accide
628.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
If the mind were a halting oracle I don't think most of our open problems in mathematics would be.
629.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
> physicalism does imply computationalism That's not true either. There are plenty of materialists who think the universe is not computable, thus it's totally possible to believe that the mind is not computable despite being en
630.
▲
by
inimino
7y ago
It would work just as well over HTTPS, they would just have to make a different phone call (to the site hosting the script rather than to the GFW).
More ›