ingebretsen

4 ms·

1.
by ingebretsen 11y ago
This is a styling framework. No patentable concepts. The code itself might fall under copyright law (which is MIT license), but not the visuals. If anything would apply there, it is probably more like trademark law, but this seems far afoot
2.
Don't get Yo!? Then try Oy!(itunes.apple.com)
11 points by ingebretsen 12y ago|1 comments
3.
Geo Theme for Bootstrap(code.divshot.com)
6 points by ingebretsen 13y ago|0 comments
4.
by ingebretsen 13y ago
I found a kit (magnet + copper tube) here: http://www.teachersource.com/product/645/electricity-magneti... Not on the same scale, but appears to be designed to demonstrate the same concept.
5.
by ingebretsen 13y ago
That's a fantastic quote and I'll update the post with that. The only corner case that I don't think it covers is type that has been digitally converted from an analog form to its digital equivalent. Lots of favorite typeface
6.
by ingebretsen 13y ago
That's a totally fair point. They're really visually distinct, especially to someone with any eye for type. Garamond is confusing because it's so old and so influential. Maybe it would have been better to choose something lik
7.
by ingebretsen 13y ago
The distinction was easier before digital type. Today we have no physical object to represent a font. The font file itself might be the closest analog to pre-digital fonts but that seems to be an even more extreme view than I took in the po
8.
Typeface vs. Font: Terminology Smackdown(nerdplusart.com)
1 points by ingebretsen 13y ago|0 comments
9.
First Digital 3D Rendered Film (from 1972) and My Visit to Pixar(nerdplusart.com)
1 points by ingebretsen 16y ago|0 comments