indiogrindio

4 ms·

1.
by indiogrindio 4y ago
> There is a problem with correlation vs causation in the article’s logic. No there isn't. You just didn't read any of the links in the article that it used for support, IE https://www.epi.org/blog/union-de
2.
by indiogrindio 4y ago
> 90% of humanity would vehemently disagree with that. > The USSR, North Korea, and Cuba all have/had lower levels of inequality than the west > In China, hundreds of millions are wealthier than they were two generations ago.
3.
by indiogrindio 4y ago
I agree with the overall argument of the article, but some of it is confusing in the point it's trying to make: > In these studies, chimps are behaving more rationally than humans. There is no wasted motion to obtain the reward. &gt
4.
by indiogrindio 4y ago
It seems like a joke article since they link to Wikipedia so much given the title. > It can come in a format similar to GitHub where anyone can present in their preferred version of a subject instead of edit-warring at a small point, and
5.
by indiogrindio 4y ago
> Too bad that the parts of the human condition that actually matter don't occur at evolutionary timescales. Sure you can say that there's a good chance Homo Sapiens will be around in one form or another for hundreds of thousan
6.
by indiogrindio 4y ago
> These trends do not lead to a sustainable future - it is like global warming, slow but indicative of bad things coming down the line, but manageable in the immediate. I wonder how many times this could have been said in the ~4 billion
7.
by indiogrindio 4y ago
It's not going to replace artists. It's just another genre. Like any art form that's done over and over, people catch onto the nuances of it and begin to get tired of it after a period of time. It's why we have different