includenotfound

3 ms·

1.
by includenotfound 5d ago
I meant the explanation does not excuse Claude's slop prose, not your comment.
2.
by includenotfound 5d ago
Sure, if you're doing easy work. But Grok is a lot more intelligent and can handle harder tasks.
3.
by includenotfound 5d ago
> That believes that the world can be simplified into dichotomies, or at least, simplified. Sometimes problems are complex, and the solutions to them necessarily so. For example, cancer You just simplified most of the problems people wor
4.
by includenotfound 5d ago
Extremely dishonest twist. If someone is doing that, it's classified as either a true threat or an incitement, both of which have been clearly established as not covered by the 1st amendment by SCOTUS and thus illegal - and can be stop
5.
by includenotfound 5d ago
From the official report: > Since LLMs can give different answers to the same question, each question was run five times. That means, each LLM was tested 600 times, and in total over 10,000 questions and answers were assessed. > All m
6.
by includenotfound 6d ago
> "Look how impressive and 'dangerous' our model is, look how naughty it was! We can't control it!" While simultaneously announcing: "btw we're releasing the ever more powerful and more dangerous and mo
7.
by includenotfound 6d ago
People flocked from other platforms to X making it the #1 iOS app in several markets for who knows how long just on the premise that it was free speech with minimal moderation. "We literally prefer it that way" might apply to you
8.
by includenotfound 6d ago
We quickly moved the goalpost from "censorship is bad" to "I really don't like your opinion, so it's OK to censor it".
9.
by includenotfound 6d ago
> When you read the bible you realize a whole lot of it is being about a breeding cult. As opposed to non-religious ideologies, whose fertility is decaying and leading them to self extinction. You have to fork() yourself eventually.
10.
by includenotfound 8d ago
They are not incompetent. I personally know a few people on their security team. They are world class security engineers. There's no way they didn't know.
11.
by includenotfound 10d ago
That's just unwarranted at this stage, given model capability and resource constraints. Furthermore, VMs are isolation at the hardware level, particularly through hypervisors. I'd say given current LLM capabilities, it's a
12.
by includenotfound 10d ago
> The entire premise is that real-world software is buggy and the LLM is much better at locating and exploiting those bugs than you are at preventing them If that was the premise, why run LLMs in a lesser sandbox than a VM? Clearly it&#x
13.
by includenotfound 11d ago
ChatGPT paid subscriptions already give you a VM [0]. OpenAI couldn't spare a few VMs for the super ultra mega dangerous evals where they asked the agents to specifically go hack stuff? [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/
14.
by includenotfound 11d ago
The best part is, they are totally able to one shot airgapping. You are too. Go ask your local agent to set up a pre-configured Linux VM with whatever stuff you want on it, then ask it to airgap it allowing only X, Y, Z services. It will on
15.
by includenotfound 11d ago
Where did you get that from? I've seen this word multiple times on the feed over the years, too.
16.
by includenotfound 11d ago
"I want the good stuff from an authoritarian dictatorship without the bad stuff" It will never work like that.
17.
by includenotfound 11d ago
https://x.com/search?q=cisgender&src=typed_query&f=live There are tons and tons of people using the term. All the time. Last result was 11 seconds ago (as of posting this).
18.
by includenotfound 11d ago
The "sandbox" they used was apparently made of thin paper exposed under a day of heavy rain, too. You'd think, if they truly believed the model is so dangerous, they'd run it in a VM without a network adapter.
19.
by includenotfound 29d ago
Extremely weak justification on their part, bordering on trolling. It's just marketing. Easy access to malicious information hasn't proven to be the disaster these anti-prophets proclaim. For the last ~3 decades of widespread inte
20.
by includenotfound 29d ago
Models are quite safe when they're useless, actually. In the times of GPT-3 I'd scoff at the idea of an LLM doing any hacking; today, I'm running several AIs on my code before publishing, and they are finding (and demonstrati
21.
by includenotfound 2mo ago
Sometimes your question was simply visually similar to another but conceptually very different, and it'd get closed for being a duplicate anyway. Then you have to re-ask it, now with a couple extra disclaimers spelling out that indeed
22.
by includenotfound 2mo ago
Perhaps not what you intended, but most of it is stored in various models' weights.
23.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
That's in fact also very technically feasible. They're already running small classifier models on both your inputs and your outputs. These models are said to be in place for safety, but they could answer 2 questions: (1) is this a
24.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
I don't doubt the Swiss could do it right technically speaking, as they do everything else, but I guess the economic argument still holds.
25.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
I find AI helps a lot with my context drift (or attention deficit). I can now simply burst type questions one after another in a large prompt, then have the AI do all the relevant searches / data collections, and spit them out quickly,
26.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
You left out the most interesting part - did you find any BTC?
27.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
Yeah, I mostly agree, except that I didn't come to Switzerland because it's next door, but because I was sick of working hard and making no money in my home country - and it was either Switzerland or the US. I had offers from both
28.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
I do in fact. Germany: https://www.bka.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Publikationen/Pol... Total N = ~2.2M Germans = ~1.2M (~58%) Non-Germans = ~900k (~42%) Population: Germans ~71M (~85%), foreign ~12M (~15
29.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
That's what the propaganda would like to have you believe. The RU/UA war was entirely orchestrated by the US. The "Russia will invade the EU" propaganda was useful to scare the EU population, so they'd accept issuin
30.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/apr/10/super-rich-aba... The rest who are not chased are usually deeply intertwined with politicians, and are running corruption schemes along them. I'm not on

More ›