Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
incadenza
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
31.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
You can come down on this either way, but part of the outrage is smaller businesses without access to the same resources most likely did pay taxes.
32.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
I’ve known other schizophrenic people who do seem to have brief periods of lucidity. Sometimes on and off throughout a day. Really sad.
33.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
There's so much conceptual / factual confusion in this post I just don't know where to start. Agree to disagree I guess.
34.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
I'm failing to see how this is complicated. Imagine the following: 1) A token gets compromised. 2) You know which token. You need to revoke access. 3) You introduce state by storing said token on disk / in memory somewhere. Key ta
35.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
Why would you arbitrarily reject a token refresh? The question here is which token to reject. That's where the state comes in. If a token is compromised, you have to know which one. Hence, stateful.
36.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
Perhaps revoking is the better term here. At least that's the use case I had in mind. If you want the ability to revoke a token, you have to have some list of black listed tokens somewhere.
37.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
My issue here is that expiring JWTs involve adding state! The whole point of JWTs is stateless authentication, so I’ve never understood the advantage over sessions unless revoking tokens is never an option.
38.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
Does anybody care to explain dependent types? I’ve heard the term used in FP conversations but not sure I get it.
39.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
Yeah but if I’m hiring you that kinda makes me the boss, no?
40.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
This just in! Standing is not exercise. I’m glad we cleared up this hotly debated topic.
41.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
Personalities like this are incredibly common in that whole industry.
42.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
This article is like a litmus year for who actually reads the full article.
43.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
Michael Albert - Participatory Economics.
44.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
Yeah I’ve never heard anyone claim or believe they’re safer. If anything, the folklore is in the opposite direction.
45.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
This seems great, but growing up among Yiddish speakers, this word has a very different connotation. Just worth being aware of.
46.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
It’s like checking the fridge when you’re not even hungry. On steroids.
47.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
This all sounds great but I cringe a bit at yet another layer of abstraction in an already insane JS tooling ecosystem. It seems like half of the time you’re just using the escape hatch to plain JS to stitch all of this stuff together, no?
48.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
To think he could have chalked up the price hikes to an Excel formatting error! I think we all would have related. Real missed opportunity.
49.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
That I typically only learn the hard way.
50.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
yeah it sounds like it. One day I’ll actually dive in and learn that stuff.
51.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
If I'm a manager, and somebody tells me that the development team wont be productive for months, I'd likely ask for some real metric indicating that Haskell solves / eliminates classes of bugs untouched by other statically ty
52.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
This project, and others like it, strike me as an extraordinary waste of time. Think of how remarkable it would be if Chimpanzees in captivity began to speak. This would mean chimpanzees have the language capacity but, in every observed chi
53.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
Maybe this explanation is simply too long, but how is this? Isn’t this simply a measurement of size? As a layman, I see how Retina can be a buzzword, but not 7nm vs 5nm.
54.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
It’s impossible to know whether you’re legally liable without more details on the arrangements made. Ethically speaking, why not ask them?
55.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy may be a decent model for this. Especially for the more conceptual / core areas of CS.
56.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
Maybe I’m oblivious, but I’ve never heard bureaucratic applied to software. I’ve got to say it fits perfectly in this case.
57.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
And you’re (Not you personally) free to do what like on your property barring negative outcomes for the entire community. Imposing restrictions on land you don’t own certainly falls in that category. Hence the stalemate I guess.
58.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
I’m confused. My sense is that the approach here should have been to put forward a set of regulations and enforcement, and then open up the market. If one of the companies violates the rules, then obviously ban them.
59.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
Yeah agreed, I don’t consider this complicated.
60.
▲
by
incadenza
8y ago
This would be an amazing step in the right direction, unless I’m missing something. Of course, this isn’t a heavy commuter route. In the absence of decent surrounding public transit it seems unlikely to make any real dent in traffic.
More ›