impulser_

8 ms·

121.
by impulser_ 8mo ago
Why would anyone care about this at all? MiniMax, DeepSeek, and Moonshot are all releasing models for the public to use for free. Anthropic, OpenAI, Google ect have been scraping information to train their models that they had no right in s
122.
by impulser_ 8mo ago
Seems like they actually fixed some of the problems with the model. Hallucinations rate seems to be much better. Seems like they also tuned the reasoning maybe that were they got most of the improvements from.
123.
by impulser_ 8mo ago
Are you using Gemini model itself or using the Gemini App? They are different.
124.
by impulser_ 8mo ago
Don't let the benchmarks fool you. Gemini models are completely useless not matter how smart they are. Google still hasn't figure out tool calling and making the model follow instructions. They seem to only care about benchmarking
125.
by impulser_ 8mo ago
Because it's Google they can't build products and they only care about benchmarking. The product they released so far are all half assed experiments. Gemini 3 Pro is now being beaten by open source models because they can't f
126.
by impulser_ 8mo ago
I'm glad more people are catching onto lightweight CLI tools and using skills to give llms more tools. It's way better than MCP. I been doing this for awhile now and it's just the best way to gets LLMs to do things with APIs
127.
by impulser_ 8mo ago
They plan to use to for "Code Mode" which mean the LLM will use this to run Python code that it writes to run tools instead of having to load the tools up front into the LLM context window.
128.
by impulser_ 8mo ago
"Max subscribers are hitting their 5 hour usage limits in 30-40 minutes with a single instance doing light work" This has not been my experience at all. The only time I even got close to this is multiple long sessions that had mul
129.
by impulser_ 8mo ago
I honestly think OpenAI needs a new leader, they are so lost. They have no vision, it seems like they are just always chasing and not leading anymore. Anthropic has a clear vision, they want to build the best agentic models so they can buil
130.
by impulser_ 9mo ago
My favorite thing is just being able to talk through the code and problem and have someone right there too response even if it not 100% right it still gets you to think and it nice to have it push back on things you ask ect. It basically a
131.
by impulser_ 10mo ago
Then why are they spending $20 billion dollars to handicap an inference company that giving open source models a major advantage over closed source models?
132.
by impulser_ 10mo ago
They don't need to catch up. They just need to be good enough and fast as fuck. Vast majority of useful tasks of LLMs has nothing to do with how smart they are. GPT-5 models have been the most useless models out of any model released t
133.
by impulser_ 10mo ago
Are they buying them to try and slow down open source models and protect the massive amounts of money they make from OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta ect? It quite obvious that open source models are catching up to closed source models very fast the
134.
by impulser_ 10mo ago
You think Cloduflare, Google, and Amazon are allowing engineers to plug Claude Code into production services? You think these companies are skipping code reviews and just saying fuck it let it do whatever it wants? Of course they aren'
135.
by impulser_ 10mo ago
Don't worry, you can use these tools and not be an idiot. Just read and confirm what it does. It's that simple.
136.
by impulser_ 10mo ago
Rule 1: Never ever run any of these tools in automatic mode.
137.
by impulser_ 10mo ago
Yeah I think it will probably go down as the biggest mistake Tesla has made. They could have spent all the effort building EV delivery trucks with built in self driving which would help them collect even more data for FSD to tell them rollo
138.
by impulser_ 10mo ago
The thing about OpenAI is their models never fit anywhere for me. Yes they maybe smart or even the smartest models but they are alway so fucking slow. The ChatGPT web app is literally usable for me. I ask simple task and it does most extrem
139.
by impulser_ 10mo ago
I guess it will depend on how good their security is, because I'm assuming Disney is entering this deal with hard guidelines on what will be allowed.
140.
by impulser_ 10mo ago
OpenAI is the only SOTA model provider that doesn't have a cutoff date in the current year. That why it preforms bad at writing code for any new libraries or libraries that have had significant updates like Svelte.
141.
by impulser_ 11mo ago
Yeah, but a lot of the rules around privacy and personal data make it hard to accept business from Europeans. If you are a small business or startup you might not even accept business from Europeans because navigating these rules are almost
142.
by impulser_ 11mo ago
It has, because it gives you access to GPUs, and TPUs for free.
143.
by impulser_ 11mo ago
What allows them to offer a free tier is that they are ok with burning and losing money not because of how they built their service. Even when a database scales to zero someone still has to pay.
144.
by impulser_ 11mo ago
Yeah, and they became an actual profitable tech company which is extremely rare today.
145.
by impulser_ 1y ago
Because that what most people call it. It's just like calling tissues Kleenex.
146.
by impulser_ 1y ago
I think the goal is to make uv a complete package manager for Python while still giving you the option to use the parts separately. uv is like cargo for python. If you only need a fast type checker you can just use ty, if you just need a fa
147.
by impulser_ 1y ago
Because they don't want the public market to put a real valuation on the company, when they can still raise money with a made up valuation.
148.
by impulser_ 1y ago
It's also the estimated monthly active users of chrome * 10.
149.
by impulser_ 1y ago
Because you can always use the best model. Yesterday is was Claude Opus 4.1, today it's GPT-5. If you just were paying Anthropic you will be stuck with Claude.
150.
by impulser_ 1y ago
Then don't use it and keep using models locally?

More ›