Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
impulser_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
impulser_
4mo ago
I don't think you understand the size of the US capital market. We are talking probably ~150 trillion. It's easy as fuck for Google to raise this money because they are a money printing business. They are the most profitable compa
62.
▲
by
impulser_
4mo ago
Yeah, but Google has the money for this. They are quite literally the most profitable company in the world. They are only raising because they don't want to harm there other businesses buy eating up their capital for this. Why do you t
63.
▲
by
impulser_
4mo ago
"models that 99.9% of the world cares about aren't." Software engineers aren't 99.9% of the world.
64.
▲
by
impulser_
4mo ago
"If all of this was done to better humanity, AI development would be done in public, data would be legally obtained, models would be released for free, access wouldn't be gatekept behind ever increasing subscription costs." T
65.
▲
by
impulser_
4mo ago
Harnesses aren't really going to change much of the performance on models like Opus, and GPT. You literally can just give the model a bash tool and it will do just fine in fact it will most likely do better than majority of harnesses d
66.
▲
by
impulser_
4mo ago
People need to stop thinking that LLMs actually know what they are. They don't. They don't know their Qwen, They don't know they are Opus. They don't even know they are an LLM. This is why literally every single model&#x
67.
▲
by
impulser_
4mo ago
No. GPT models follow instructions significantly better than Claude models. You tell it too research a repo to find a piece of code it will. Claude will just read the README and guess.
68.
▲
by
impulser_
4mo ago
Crazy they bring up honest, when Claude models are literally known for straight up lying about things it has done and tries to act like it did what you asked.
69.
▲
by
impulser_
4mo ago
I have tested almost every language and Go is pretty good but for some reason LLMs get paranoid over races and just start spamming locks next thing you know every fucking struct has mutexes and every function has locks lol. The best languag
70.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
Jarred said this had nothing to do with Mythos or Anthropic.
71.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
Yeah, maybe these aren't good guesses. I was basing it off CapEx and Elon's tweet about them. Maybe C2 isn't completely filled yet.
72.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
Well Colossus 1 has 230k GPUs, including 30k GB200s and Colossus 2 has 550k GB200s & GB300s. So my guess on costs would be like ~$10B for Colossus 1, and Colossus 2 would be like ~20b.
73.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
They are. This is from their "Chief Compute Officer". https://x.com/nottombrown/status/2057194829986300375
74.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
"in May 2026, we entered into Cloud Services Agreements with Anthropic PBC (“Anthropic”), an AI research and development public benefit corporation, with respect to access to compute capacity across COLOSSUS and COLOSSUS II. Pursuant t
75.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
Then don't say your not a "Cloud on top of a cloud" provider. They even made fun of cloud providers being down when AWS was down.
76.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
They literally own their own data centers. That's whats surprising about this. They are lying to their customers when they say they operate their own data center because obviously they don't if everyone's apps are down with G
77.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
Not really. They have usable models, but it probably Anthropic, OpenAI, Google -> Chinese labs -> NVIDIA, AllenAI, Mistral.
78.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
I think the opposite. It allows more people to be creative. Similar to how the DAW allowed more people to become musicians. You can produce a hit song with just a laptop now. Now you can have people producing videos without needing a crew o
79.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
I would bet money Anthropic and OpenAI are actually profitable on inference. The problem is they have to spend large sums of money to train models that are essentially worthless after a few months.
80.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
I'm pretty sure he's talking about companies and people outsourcing their decision making and thinking to AI and not really about using AI itself. I don't think using AI to write code is AI psychosis or bad at all, but if you
81.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
What do you guys assume that a codebase from an unsafe language containing bindings to another unsafe language would appear perfectly implemented right away?
82.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
Say what you want about OpenAI, but their software is actually pretty dam good especially compared to Anthropic and Google. Anthropic is just sloppy, and Google just doesn't live on this planet. Both of the Codex apps are very good. I
83.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
"We haven’t committed to rewriting. There’s a very high chance all this code gets thrown out completely."
84.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
People need to understand Google. They have a long line of failures, because they are an innovative company. Their whole goal is to scale products to billions of users. So if they release a product, and they see no path to billions of users
85.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
People really need to stop assuming more training data the better. This is not how it works. LLM thrive off consistency. Go for example has significantly less training data than Python, but LLMs are the best at it. Why? Go is often written
86.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
https://x.ai/news/anthropic-compute-partnership There is literally not enough compute dude. If we had infinite compute we would see everyone building Mythos size models. "Right.. and computers were once the size o
87.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
Have you tried purego? You can just embed the C library into the binary of the Go app call it directly in Go. Most of the time I have found calling C from Go faster or on par with calling C from Python. https://github.com/eb
88.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
Local models are always going to be useless unless compute get significantly cheaper, and it's not. TSMC might literally run out of capacity to build any consumer compute product. Once computer constraints ease up, you will see much la
89.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
Majority of apps are B2C apps, they don't need any of this. All you need is Apple and Google Oauth.
90.
▲
by
impulser_
5mo ago
Yeah, but data centers allow for jobs which gives people money to buy food.
More ›