3 ms·
I think the opposite. It allows more people to be creative. Similar to how the DAW allowed more people to become musicians. You can produce a hit song with just
by impulser_ 5mo ago
I think the opposite. It allows more people to be creative. Similar to how the DAW allowed more people to become musicians. You can produce a hit song with just a laptop now.
Now you can have people producing videos without needing a crew of people.
- LetsGetTechnicl 5mo agoYou never needed a crew of people to make videos. This is just outsourcing people's creativity.
- criddell 5mo agoThe potential for harm is so much greater with video than creating an mp3. You can stoke hate and fear so easily.
- baq 5mo agoThe method in the madness is to generate so much on demand slop no one will accidentally find your hate and FUD content anyway.
- criddell 5mo agoIt will be found because our politicians will share it.
- bethekidyouwant 5mo agoOr the opposite? all tools are dangerous…
- jplusequalt 5mo ago>I think the opposite. It allows more people to be creative. Why are you assuming that a majority of people don't already have the means to make videos? Many people have access to a phone, laptop, and stable internet connection. What else do they really need? What's stopping them from using their phones to shoot home movies, making animations with MS Paint, recording themselves talking about a subject they're genuinely interested in, etc.? >Now you can have people producing videos without needing a crew of people. This is conflating production values with creativity. Mr. Beast's videos cost millions of dollars to film and produce, yet they're creatively bankrupt.