impossiblefork

5 ms·

31.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
I didn't initially understand your comment, but you mean basically something like that the origin of feminism was in socialism and the CIA saw that it was going to be unavoidable or at least popular and wanting to avoid this leading to
32.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
Yes, and people understood it as it happened. There's a Swedish song, which sees it like this "daghemmets utbygnadstakt regleras av konjunkturen, så tillmäts kvinnan sin plats i den ekonomiska strukturen, en billig arbetskraftsres
33.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
Yes, but a driver's license can be accepted as ID. Just because a driver's license isn't proof of citizenship doesn't mean that it isn't sufficient, since it will have some identifier connected to the identity of th
34.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
That isn't how the Statute of Rome works. The Statute of Rome applies to things done on the territory of signatories. So if a US person has operated in the territory of a signatory, and committed something suspected to be a covered cri
35.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
I don't see how they could legally intervene. Most EU countries have very independent court systems. Once the warrant is sent to the states, it will be enforced.
36.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
The ICC already has the authority to punish people who interfere with its operations. It's on them to prosecute people who cooperate with sanctions and the like to retaliate against the judges or lawyers or others working for the court
37.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
Well, that is not the court's position, or the position of any of the signatories the Rome Statute.
38.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
"Article 70 - Offences against the administration of justice Offences against the administration of justice [...] (c) Corruptly influencing a witness, obstructing or interfering with the attendance or testimony of a witness, retaliatin
39.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
I think what's needed here is for A/I to go the ECHR. A state failing to prevent foreign sanctions from restricting the freedom of association of its citizens is certainly a breach of article 11. It doesn't matter whether it&
40.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
The ICC has tools for countering this kind of thing though. They can order anyone who impedes them seized and handed over for judgement to the ICC, including bank CEOs and the like participating in retaliatory measures against them. They ha
41.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
Yes, my system is intended to be used on proper computers. I am not interested in phones at all.
42.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
Yes, definitely in the 80s.
43.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
No, of course there isn't a visible receiver address. You have a list of peers, P1,...,PN, every second, at a specific pre-decided time, slightly fuzzed to avoid timing stuff, you send a message to each of them. If you don't put o
44.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
No, you always send a dummy message the appointed time. If you have a real message, or a network maintenance message, that substitutes for a dummy message. You never send messages other than at the appointed time. Delayed or dropped message
45.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
Ah, blockchain-based. Maybe it's fine. I prefer my idea with dummy messages and no ledgers or anything.
46.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
I don't understand your comment.
47.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
The issue is complicated. Many EU governments care, because Turkey cares, but the problem is that Turkey's position that they're terrorists is legally iffy, so a lot of European courts disagree, and this creates a schizophrenic si
48.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
No. With dummy messages you are guaranteed that traffic analysis will not be possible. Because you connect to the network, then start sending messages to everybody continuously, a message every second, or every ten seconds, or every 100 sec
49.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
Signal will allow traffic analysis. You send the message to signal, if they wish they can write down to whom they send it on. It is impossible to make a secure system without the continuous transmission of dummy messages to large numbers of
50.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
Yes, but it's fine. If you receive 10,000 messages per second, that's nothing. That means that you can have 10,000 people online simultaneously with 1 message per second and 100,000 people online simultaneously with 1 message ever
51.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
Yes, but then you have to accept that they can't be part of a group that needs security. If they aren't willing to do things correctly, not be lazy etc., and you tell them that this means that adversaries will be able to pinpoint
52.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
Yeah, but it is possible to make distributed systems. I've written up a little toy in Erlang where you have lots of connections to peers and send dummy messages, all of the same size, to all your peers continuously and then, because of
53.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
Very strange to decide to only supply a communications system to people ideologically aligned with one. That seems like it would make one stand out to an undesirable degree, and it makes me wonder whether these groups actually do this, or w
54.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
One could hope so, or it would be best for me if it were. I don't think I can count on that though. I don't think I can hope for anything better than 30-70 in my lifetime, and I think 10-90 almost requires you to buy the design fi
55.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
I don't agree. At the moment companies like NVIDIA take several times what it costs to make a chip. I think the fair split for the technology contribution is more like 50-50, maybe even 30-70 in favour of the manufacturer. With competi
56.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
Sorry, I seem to have messed up this comment, I didn't mean prompt injections, I meant leakage of human thought into the model. Basically the idea is that if I train a model that speaks like a human, it will follow human biases. If I t
57.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
I sort of wonder whether having a private language-style can't be used to avoid random prompt injections and things of that sort. Maybe they've screwed up, but another possibility is that they wrote all their post-training example
58.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
They become very non-public datasets though, and it does not preserve the culture the books represent.
59.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
It's culture. These scans are of course not distributed, so the value doesn't quite continue to exist. You say "culture", but is is culture , and culture that was interesting enough to write down. Writing a book in the
60.
by impossiblefork 1mo ago
In order to read them, presumably. Just because they are for sale doesn't mean that no one else would have bought them. Destroying them obviously destroys them, which obviously destroys culture. After all, if the books is destroyed, it

More ›