im_a_lawyer

5 ms·

1.
by im_a_lawyer 13y ago
you are pathetic
2.
by im_a_lawyer 13y ago
There are no women here. Rural India has a better gender ratio than Sillicon Valley.
3.
by im_a_lawyer 13y ago
NYC is much cheaper than SF and much more pleasant to live in than vast majority of cities in the US. You wouldn't convince me to live anywhere on the west. I would rather make 2x less money in NYC than live in some tract suburb with i
4.
by im_a_lawyer 13y ago
build more housing!!!
5.
by im_a_lawyer 13y ago
That's great but you assume that there is a choice. I want to live in a nice city, but I can't. Trillions of dollars, decades of government policies and dozen of agencies with their "homeownership" programs destroyed our
6.
by im_a_lawyer 13y ago
^ this. The amount of "ultra-luxury" towers going on in my city is way too high. Who the fuck has $800,000 cash? Numbers don't add up.
7.
by im_a_lawyer 13y ago
>> I can't see the use case for a car. I live in the Plateau Mont-Royal neighborhood of montreal. Everything I need is literally a five minute walk away in any direction. A bike gets me downtown about as fast as a car does in sum
8.
by im_a_lawyer 13y ago
This and schools. There are no non-racist solutions to this.
9.
by im_a_lawyer 13y ago
I don't believe that site is even using census data or at least not in the correct way. Ratio should be separated by age groups. Counting > 60 yr olds is a mistake because at that point women outnumber men 3:1 at least. San Jose has
10.
by im_a_lawyer 13y ago
not even close to accurate and I was talking about silicon valley in general.
11.
by im_a_lawyer 13y ago
>> It's not like Boston or NYC are significantly cheaper than the valley. Yes they are plus some of us really don't want to live in a place with a 3:1 gender ratio.