ilyt

52 ms·

931.
by ilyt 3y ago
We did had some of the talks with lawyer about security (in particular logs) and general consensus was that as long as they are stored explicitly for that purpose and only that purpose it isn't a problem, they just have to be properly
932.
by ilyt 3y ago
Weird they are specifying a database technology used, it's kinda irrelevant to the whole thing
933.
by ilyt 3y ago
Remove all the tracking code BOOM, thousands lines of code less to manage. GDPR is only a problem if your main business is selling people's data. As it should be.
934.
by ilyt 3y ago
None of the governments did; but GDPR is step in right direction compared to... whatever the fuck US is doing.
935.
by ilyt 3y ago
...and ? "I fixed problem for myself but I'd like for it to not be a problem at all for other people that are poorer or less technical than me" is perfectly reasonable stance to take.
936.
by ilyt 3y ago
basic logic and courtesy 1:0 TekMol
937.
by ilyt 3y ago
I've seen few american news sites and shops showing the fuck you EU page. which is a bit weird because if shops does none of the business with EU they don't even need it...
938.
by ilyt 3y ago
Compliance with GDPR is extremely easy: just don't gather PII in the first place. And if you want to gather data it's also not too hard, just ask for it and tell user exactly what you're going to do with it. It's when yo
939.
by ilyt 3y ago
Ah, yes, propaganda on my wall, so much "art". But I wouldn't mind big reasonably priced piece of e-ink on the wall that I can put stuff relevant to me on.
940.
by ilyt 3y ago
The cost is few k's at most, not exactly massive cost for medium sized company or bigger. We pay x10 for power alone
941.
by ilyt 3y ago
I'd suggest dusting off some math and calculating JUST HOW MUCH CF would need to be better compared to having 2 different ISPs fail at same time. We had not that happen in 10 years > That’s certainly possible in specific cases, but
942.
by ilyt 3y ago
I'd be far worried about single homed internet connection than brand of the switch.
943.
by ilyt 3y ago
Doesn't matter. Single or million boxes, if they apply wrong config, it doesn't work. You dual home because you hedge your bets and hope no 2 ISPs gonna have fuckup at same time
944.
by ilyt 3y ago
It looks like their upstream provider fucked something up so until they release that info we can only speculate.
945.
by ilyt 3y ago
I expected in a forum with far more than 10k users for this to be common enough that it would be first suggestion or the post's content. Not apparently some rare unknown knowledge that I only thought it was normal because corpo I work
946.
by ilyt 3y ago
....that's horrid. Why would you do that to your fellow humans ? just use cat >outfile <<EOF some data EOF add base64 if binary edit: after looking thru the thread I am deeply disappointed so little people
947.
by ilyt 3y ago
Well it was clearly too "done" coz they decided to rewrite everything in Electron
948.
by ilyt 3y ago
> I feel like Evernote is a prime example of the pains of trying to convert free users to paying users for the same features, something we see in many VC funded software from its era. Once you give something away, it's damn near imp
949.
by ilyt 3y ago
This as a feature attached to their containers would be pretty spiffy tbh. But as you said, if it was entirely user-controlled.
950.
by ilyt 3y ago
Okay ? If FF knows signature of known bad extension why would it block it only on some sites?! That makes zero sense from security perspective. It would be like asking antivirus to only let virus access D:\ drive...
951.
by ilyt 3y ago
Okay? You have "malicious" extension. Why would you allow it to run everyhere ? What would just limiting the "fix" of blocking it to inevitably only some set of US banks (as I doubht they get the all URLs to every bank i
952.
by ilyt 3y ago
"it's fine because power users can disable it deep into about:config options that are not even in config panel" is a terrible excuse
953.
by ilyt 3y ago
That from company that force-installed addons for marketing purposes... and you wonder why people are careful around another "genius" idea from Mozilla.
954.
by ilyt 3y ago
I think that's spot on. More mature model of that is message passing like in Erlang or in a bit more bastardized version, in Golang. And it works there because you can write "normal" code with no colored functions and other b
955.
by ilyt 3y ago
That's the issue here. You need to be 100% sure handler is entirely bug free or any site can redirect to that url and exploit any bug in it
956.
by ilyt 3y ago
So +/- a year and there is a chance for one that "just works" without fuckery? Nice, I might pick up one for some home automation. Specs wise it looks pretty interesting as it could be used as pretty much all in one (2x ether
957.
by ilyt 3y ago
I mean if you write database code in PHP or JS fair enough but you're fucking doomed if you do anyway.
958.
by ilyt 3y ago
I've seen around 20% increase in even dumb "a web app returning some text" benchmarks. It certainly shouldt be charged as a second real core would but it isn't nothing (like in P4 era you apparently time travelled from)
959.
by ilyt 3y ago
I just clone it to /tmp, that gets removed on restart. Having it as button in browser seems cool but also horribly insecure...
960.
by ilyt 3y ago
Right but that didn't change in last 20 years. Cities that suck driving (and walking) in now sucked as much and more 20 years ago. It's not that that changed how much people want to have driving license.

More ›