illright

3 ms·

1.
by illright 5d ago
In the comments there's a link to consumer rights wiki that includes Raspberry Pi's response to this: > there may be a minor financial gain in buying a part with say a 2GB part, swapping it for an 8GB part of dubious origin, an
2.
by illright 6d ago
The software still remains free, it's the registry that would become a paid service under such a model, that's what was proposed in the article. And even then, the registry would remain free for individuals, so it would merely be
3.
by illright 6d ago
I think it's a great idea and I hope someone inside the teams of popular registries sees this and they actually give it a go. I imagine the shitstorm of reactions that it's gonna cause from people who aren't even included in
4.
by illright 10d ago
I think this article presents a good rebuttal to this model — foundations will never pay the long tail, and sometimes the payout may not even be all that substantial for them to bother. The model in the article has the benefit of being auto
5.
by illright 17d ago
I wonder why they only support Apple platforms, citing CoreML. Doesn't Android have a similar framework, ML Kit?
6.
by illright 2mo ago
That bit of text looks pretty unremarkable to me, what makes you think that no one talks or writes like this?
7.
by illright 3mo ago
Thanks for the write-up, I've been interested in connecting RF-controlled devices to Home Assistant myself lately! Your experience will definitely come in handy :) Are you following HA's latest push towards proxy devices? A few mo
8.
by illright 3mo ago
I'm glad that Lumo has image editing capabilities now, if it's half as good as ChatGPT, that means I no longer have to upload photos of my room to OpenAI to try a new paint color. However, I trust Lumo only marginally more than Ch
9.
by illright 4mo ago
I didn't read the title of the article in that way, and I believe it to be a bad-faith reading. I understood the title to mean "the people in FOSS whom we treat with the same morbid curiosity and provokation as the mentally ill pe
10.
by illright 4mo ago
It's a good thing I found his personal statement about this report before I found the report itself — https://drewdevault.com/blog/Addressing-harassment/ Having read both now, I'm willing to take him at
11.
by illright 4mo ago
I don't find it appropriate to make these kinds of assumptions about the author. It's okay to disagree, but it would help the conversation if you elaborated why you didn't enjoy the article
12.
by illright 6mo ago
Nice article, it does a good job of conveying just how simple it is to use the OS primitives for secure-ish* delivery of secrets. I think it falls short in meeting people where they are when they use env files. I appreciate the section at t
13.
by illright 8mo ago
I disagree that this submission has no value at all or that it should be auto-banned — there is a difference between thoughtless vibe-coding and spec-driven coding, guarded by tests. It seems from the next thread that this project is hopele
14.
by illright 9mo ago
You can see the dimensions in the full spec table on the preorder page https://repebble.com/watch
15.
by illright 9mo ago
Dang, I really liked that there were screws on the Time 2. Does that at least mean waterproofing will be better? :p For instance, would it be a good idea to swim with the Round 2 on?
16.
by illright 9mo ago
Is the Round 2 also going to have screws to potentially replace the battery, like Time 2 does? Also, while watching the announcement video, I noticed that the pixels are quite a bit more visible on the Round 2 on the same watchface, when co
17.
by illright 1y ago
I don't even go past their monthly allowance :) I don't have that much audio to process
18.
by illright 1y ago
A very worthwhile mention is also Stable-TS: https://github.com/jianfch/stable-ts Out of the box it can transcribe with Whisper or Faster-Whisper, but it can also align audio with an existing human-written transcript,