Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ikiris
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
44 ms
·
691.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
ahahahahahaha
692.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
That doesn't mean they're against the amendment, just that they disagree with your interpretation of it.
693.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
Yes absolutely, just have to have the right SRE see it. That isn't really what should be the workflow though.
694.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
almost all, and code isn't the only thing that exists.
695.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
You just triggered probably 50 sres involved in this bug.
696.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
If you have this attitude working at a fang, you'll eventually be the guy the other guy kneecaps and outruns when you're both running from a bear.
697.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
I have no doubt your emotionally detached analysis decided the floors were adequately/overstaffed since the nurses hadn't all quit yet or gone on strike. I mean they clearly are still working there, they can always do a bit more t
698.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
or... better yet.... 24 hour staffing. like a functioning 24 hour service should be. This is just abusing the nurse to save a buck.
699.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
Its just corpspeak for "we don't want to commit to you getting time off or a possible slight payout"
700.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
please cite where an npr report gives the impression she's been scapegoated in such a way that she doesn't deserve the consequences she's been given. I'd love to read it honestly. From what I've seen there's be
701.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
Yeah, I agree. You sound like many healthcare admins I've worked with and for. I'm not sure its the flex in this argument you think it is.
702.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
Comments like this are showing just how much you don't understand maintaining a service level based care, and are stuck in thinking in terms of producing a product. Combined with willfully ignoring that basically all floors are intenti
703.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
It's because it would actually double the amount of care on most floors, because they're usually at 60% of the staffing they need as a start because they've been able to get away with that for years.
704.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
Yeah the incredulous looks I get when I turn down gigs at "unlimited" PTO positions are just wild. Like what did you expect to happen? We're not stupid.
705.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
for those that aren't aware, a while here reads as at least 40 years, and it gets worse every year, especially the last 10 or so. With additional nuance that this kind of thing used to be protected a bit by the additional guard of a ph
706.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
Yeah, there's no doubt that this is a shitshow from how Vandy is described (and nursing in general especially with these automated pharm boxes), but that should be additional consequences, not this nurse avoiding hers.
707.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
This nurse was the decision maker in whether she bothered to check the label on the vial for what she was injecting to the patient, and / or bothering to scan it as required before leaving them to die in terror. I'm not sure wha
708.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
Its the strong libertarian vibe. They think consequences shouldn't exist, and the dead guy can take his money elsewhere.
709.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
Enforcing criminal liability for homicidal negligence is how you force respect of even basic safety requirements that already existed. I'm not arguing that hospitals aren't currently a shitshow, I'm aware I've worked in
710.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
If nurses quit over criminal liability for killing someone by being that careless, everyone is better off by them not being in the field. Pharmacy has had the same rules for over a hundred years. A great example is even in the movie a wonde
711.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
Yeah usually that difference is causing someone to die by being criminally negligent. Which she was.
712.
▲
by
ikiris
4y ago
No one cares about ux in hospital purchasing at all unless it’s an admin app.
713.
▲
by
ikiris
5y ago
Yeah they should have called that tool yolocat
714.
▲
by
ikiris
5y ago
That's your typical small shareholder in a nutshell.
715.
▲
by
ikiris
5y ago
I mean obviously users are going to cut and paste that output. It's completely hostile design in terms of usability on their part. What did you expect to happen?
716.
▲
by
ikiris
5y ago
So... Cramer has twitter stock.
717.
▲
by
ikiris
5y ago
Today op found out they're the problem lol
718.
▲
by
ikiris
5y ago
Yeah pretty much. How exactly do people expect the "you appear to be muted and talking" notification to work... exactly? eye roll
719.
▲
by
ikiris
5y ago
Comcast will never have to play at dumb.
720.
▲
by
ikiris
5y ago
So you don't plug servers into an existing switch? Do they just connect via magic or something?
More ›