Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ikiris
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
271.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
This is a completely different discussion. They absolutely should be reliable. The part that is a complete non starter is not being networked because it ignores that telemedicine, pacs integration, and telerobotics exist. If you don't
272.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
If you don't see that the thing that happened today that blew up the world was the rollout, I don't know what to tell you.
273.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
Dude, the fact that it breaks directly. You sound like the guy that a few years ago tried to argue (the company in question) tested os code that didn't include any drivers for their gear's local storage. Its obvious it wasn't
274.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
Do you think everyone involved is physically present? The gp was absolutely accurate that you guys have no idea how modern healthcare works and this had nothing to do with externally introduced malware.
275.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
To add detail for those that don't understand, the big healthcare players barely have unix teams, and the small mom and pop groups literally have desktops sitting under the receptionist desk running the shittiest software imaginable. T
276.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
For relying on windows to run this kind of stuff and not doing any kind of staged rollout but just blindly applying untested kernel driver 3rd party patching fleet wide? yeah honestly. We had safer rollouts for cat videos than y'all se
277.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
If by more efficient, you mean more efficiently switching to stock buybacks to pad owner pockets outside of tax consequences.
278.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
I didn't say it was difficult, but man you sound it with that additude/arrogance.
279.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
https://leetcode.com/problems/spiral-matrix/description/ If you ask me a question like this, I'm going to judge your company pretty harshly.
280.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
Do you want every person in the world to run a line to your house, or do you want to have 1, and use that service to talk to them?
281.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
You're literally running their program already. They're already running arbitrary code on your machine.
282.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
This shows kind of a naive view of security. Many soft targets are believed to be safe from adversaries that absolutely are not and are used for escalation chains or access to data. Hospitals often try to make this argument about unsecure M
283.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
the dunning kruger effect
284.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
Few is if they're lucky. More like 1.
285.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
Who else is there at the moment? Boeing who people don't even trust in atmo, and the russians who we're in a cold war with?
286.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
Because if they had something in addition, that might cost another dollar that wouldn't be going to his Twitter debt.
287.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
Windows workstations are expected to be dumb clients. They and everyone else really think that if you have actual workloads on them that's what W Server or really linux is for.
288.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
Because the whole point is a mitm can compromise it, and the mitm can listen on 80 regardless if you turn yours off.
289.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
Radon is scary, and surprisingly everywhere in some regions.
290.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
Thank you for being the voice of reason in this... mess of a thread
291.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
My anti tiger rock also has kept my life tiger free.
292.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
Because they died... This is like reading that seatbelts cause head injuries.
293.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
They probably didn't pick devs that they trusted, they picked the ones they thought were the cheapest.
294.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
Because roads and pipes cost money, and you eventually have to pay for it.
295.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
That’s certainly a take.
296.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
What was the side channel attack? There’s no way I’m reading 20 pages of networking for absolute toddlers to try to find it.
297.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
Sure, go build your own less reliable cloud. But don't pretend that single box pricing is comparable to single cloud service as a result.
298.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
You're missing the point. There's a massive difference between getting a box service, and getting a highly available regionally distributed service with a semblance of a SLA of bandwidth to anywhere on the planet. To quote a forme
299.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
because unless you have matching routes, most specific wins
300.
▲
by
ikiris
2y ago
So go with hetzner?
More ›