ijusthadto

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ijusthadto 1y ago

   We are witnessing how techno-feudalism is eating capitalism. "Subscribe to your job skills. Only today, 30% off!"
2. 2.▲
   by ijusthadto 1y ago

   Exactly this. Strange that this comment got downwoted. AI companies are scrapping the entire internet disregarding copyright and pirating books. Without it, models will be useless.
3. 3.▲
   by ijusthadto 1y ago

   Because there is a build step. npm run build -> static html and css
4. 4.▲
   by ijusthadto 1y ago

   Non-techy folks often don't touch terminal. With astro, you start with terminal. Can it be reliable for production use? Yes. Can non-techy make it reliable for production use? Who knows. E-commerce and marketing sites are at the two op
5. 5.▲
   by ijusthadto 1y ago

   Astro is, and should be treated, as a static site generator. > Does it make it easier to throw in necessary JS (e.g. for comments)? With astro you can combine html, css and js in a single file ( .astro). You write plain JS (TypeScript) w
6. 6.▲
   by ijusthadto 1y ago

   Please stop recommending React as the de facto framework, we need some critical thinking back into front-end. HTML, CSS and JS are much better alternatives.