iji40

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by iji40 6y ago

   So that’s a no on listening rather than continuing down the falsehood path, then? Roger that.
2. 2.▲
   by iji40 6y ago

   No, I don’t, because they do. The entire thesis of the upstream argument is false. You’re arguing a falsehood. There are no special libraries to defeat privacy available to first party apps. They use the same exact methods externals do. The
3. 3.▲
   by iji40 6y ago

   Because more apps than Apple Maps consume that information. Your “never ask to turn it off” returns to the complete misunderstanding of how permissions work. You are not prompted because you already granted it access during provisioning, an
4. 4.▲
   by iji40 6y ago

   You know, given this forum’s recent experience with misinformation about Apple, I shouldn’t be surprised to read a completely false comment (and another accusing Apple of illegal behavior downthread, also known as actionable libel). And yet