idisagree

3 ms·

1.
by idisagree 2y ago
>immediately concerned with the leftist recruiting ring that social media had become, being compromised. I've already trawled your internet presence enough to know you're an activist. you're revolting.
2.
by idisagree 2y ago
haha, keep getting weirder, tech industry, nothing can save you from the coming regulation, inquiries, arbitration and/or lawsuits and other forms of attack due in part to people becoming rapidly fatigued by this bs where everything is
3.
by idisagree 2y ago
Oh wow, imagine that, a forced meme in tech pushed primarily by marketers, this is totally not a trend at all. /sarcasm this is like when UX designers mess with a GUI just because they need to make themselves look useful on occasion.
4.
by idisagree 3y ago
because it's microsoft's browser and they should never ever be rewarded for what they did to netscape. ever. how about because I said "no", because I can, that's why.
5.
by idisagree 3y ago
talking about class war? that's not very ESG compliant of David Brooks, lol. we can't have that now, talking about class iniquity is not supported by investment funds like woke stuff is. last time we had this kind of political dis
6.
by idisagree 6y ago
What did you expect? People fostered this environment, did you really think it was going to just stop at some arbitrary point? Now that there's a child abuse coverup involved now we all care about censorship? Give me a break. The sjw m
7.
by idisagree 6y ago
welcome to the litigation phase of the culture war! those who have relied on corrupt social politics and tech industry cronyism to survive so far are likely to not survive what is coming, at the very least they won't be unscathed. I kn
8.
by idisagree 6y ago
and then they can argue that a conduit, like an allegedly neutral platform, has no right banning people who didn't break any laws. much like a phone carrier can't drop my calls for saying I like unpopular person X Patreon isn&#x