idiot_

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by idiot_ 14y ago

   There's a typo in the 3d para. and at the bottom. It should say 602(a) not 106(3). 106 delineates the rights. (And those rights are subject to 109.) 602 delineates what is infringement. The dissent in the 2d Cir. case points out that 602 d
2. 2.▲
   by idiot_ 14y ago

   Class actions are not about rounding up plaintiffs so you can shakedown BigCorp. That's only what enterprising American lawyers have made them. And that's what the public sees. Class actions are supposed to be about jusdicial efficiency.
3. 3.▲
   by idiot_ 14y ago

   First of all, the title asks about iPod and you refer to iPad. But the real question is why do you care about the possibility that consumers might pay less for their iPads? Are you trying to keep prices high? This is a simple issue of para