Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
iconjack
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
Mathematician Eric Weinstein Launches a New Podcast, the Portal
(bigthink.com)
1 points
by
iconjack
7y ago
|
0 comments
62.
▲
by
iconjack
7y ago
Red McCombs is turning in his grave.
63.
▲
by
iconjack
7y ago
Also 1978: "International Team of Specialists Finds No End in Sight to 30‐Year Cooling Trend in Northern Hemisphere" [1] https://www.nytimes.com/1978/01/05/archives/international-te...
64.
▲
by
iconjack
8y ago
There are a few bars within two blocks of me and the site didn't find any of them. I like the minimalistic look but isn't the database the whole point of it?
65.
▲
by
iconjack
8y ago
Also NASA: Antarctic Sea Ice Reaches New Record Maximum (2014) [1] NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses (2015) [2] etc etc etc [1] https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/antarctic-
66.
▲
by
iconjack
9y ago
Just a few days ago, Google apparently banned shopping results for "water guns" and so forth. The urge to censor in service of one's politics is strong everywhere.
67.
▲
by
iconjack
9y ago
This is so 2006.
68.
▲
The Case for Shunning the White House
(nytimes.com)
2 points
by
iconjack
9y ago
|
0 comments
69.
▲
by
iconjack
9y ago
I knew a guy who made seat cushions for boats that could also be using as life savers. They were made of foam and such—no electronics at all. When he got a contract to sell a bunch of them to the Navy, he had to fill out paperwork certifyin
70.
▲
by
iconjack
9y ago
This is great news. Now when somebody asks to Skype with me, I can tell them "Sorry, I'm on Linux".
71.
▲
by
iconjack
9y ago
http://realmode.com/glaciers.html
72.
▲
by
iconjack
9y ago
It wasn't just that there were germ theory skeptics, it was that its detractors were the consensus (ahem) unwilling to listen. Read the wiki on germ theory and you'll see its timeline consists of one heretic after another being sh
73.
▲
by
iconjack
9y ago
The story I heard at the time was that the IBM team did want to go with the 68000, but Motorola couldn't guarantee enough units.
74.
▲
by
iconjack
10y ago
(Score:5, Insightful)
75.
▲
by
iconjack
10y ago
Not really, no. http://beta.dmi.dk/en/groenland/maalinger/greenland-ice-shee...
76.
▲
by
iconjack
10y ago
There should be an n·log(n) column.
77.
▲
by
iconjack
10y ago
None of the founders (should read co-founders) of billion-dollar companies in the study came from Iran. There's a table in the report.
78.
▲
by
iconjack
10y ago
None from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Sudan or Yemen.
79.
▲
by
iconjack
10y ago
It was a really fun time in internet history. Patrick "live blogged" his bank misadventure, and for a couple of weeks his site was the first thing I'd check every day. Very exciting. It felt downright pioneering.
80.
▲
Fixing the Fibonacci sequence inside Pascal's triangle in a couniverse
(siddhanathan.github.io)
5 points
by
iconjack
10y ago
|
1 comments
81.
▲
by
iconjack
10y ago
4) The President and his staff are correct, despite prevailing opinion of scientists and media.
82.
▲
by
iconjack
10y ago
Without a Ph.D?! Really?
83.
▲
by
iconjack
10y ago
I believe the intent of Assange's statement that a 14-year-old could have made this hack, as well as Trump's tweeting of the statement, was to emphasize the non-sophistication of the attack (commonplace phishing), contrary to the
84.
▲
The U.S. Government thinks thousands of Russian hackers may be reading my blog
(theintercept.com)
34 points
by
iconjack
10y ago
|
7 comments
85.
▲
by
iconjack
10y ago
Comes on 33 disks, 28 of which are printer drivers.
86.
▲
by
iconjack
10y ago
Started very strong, mediocre by the end.
87.
▲
by
iconjack
10y ago
The 17 is for '17, aka 2017, the year she was to become president.
88.
▲
by
iconjack
10y ago
Why not let wikileaks serve the emails on the MIT page? It's the way the web is supposed to work. Also, the wikileaks archive is the "official" copy in some sense.
89.
▲
by
iconjack
10y ago
Doesn't that mean your OS is rather broken as well?
90.
▲
by
iconjack
10y ago
Well of course it makes your account less secure. It's another attack vector. As shown in the post, Google doesn't say add a phone number "to make your account more secure", it says "so you don't get locked out
More ›