iaw

26 ms·

271.
by iaw 6y ago
Last federal case probably. The Democratic states Attorneys Generals mostly have not signed onto the lawsuit because they don't want to be bound by unfavorable settlement terms (sorry I can't remember where I read that in the las
272.
by iaw 6y ago
I've begun to wonder if it isn't somewhere in the middle. Perhaps the emails, texts, and photos are real but from a Russian hack and are being selectively released in an effort to paint Hunter Biden in the worst possible light hop
273.
by iaw 6y ago
Thank you, this is the most compelling case I've seen here for the emails being real. I don't know that I reach the same conclusions as you though. The lack of denials is disconcerting and does imply some elements of truth in the
274.
by iaw 6y ago
I still don't think you know what that word means. Every non-partisan news source sees through the NY Post and Giuliani which is why it looks like this is being suppressed by the main-stream media, because they require corroboration su
275.
by iaw 6y ago
In order to determine impartiality you have to use your brain to think through what the themes of every article coming from the paper are. An impartial source of news will be critical of both sides, a biased source of news is only critical
276.
by iaw 6y ago
> You're a hack I'm kinda amused, I don't think you know what the word hack means when referring to a person. Regardless of your personal beliefs I still hope you stay healthy and safe during these trying times.
277.
by iaw 6y ago
Not sure if you watched the video at the top of that page but the word "allegedly" was emphasized in describing the emails provenance. Where's the verification?
278.
by iaw 6y ago
I don't read papers that aren't trustworthy so I can't tell you. I suspect that posts starting to go viral get flagged more urgently than a run of the mill tabloid story.
279.
by iaw 6y ago
There is some level of irony that Republicans, who are notoriously anti-regulation, want more regulation when an unregulated industry negatively impacts them.
280.
by iaw 6y ago
The twitter user is making a rational argument about the claims in the tabloid article. The twitter users claims are demonstrably true. There is no trust involved in understanding the twitter users thesis. There are oodles of trust involv
281.
by iaw 6y ago
DKIM? Link to independent (non-tabloid) confirmation?
282.
by iaw 6y ago
If the data was acquired through an alternative means then what was stated doesn't that raise questions about the validity of the claims against Hunter Biden? I mean, liars are gonna lie about more than one thing.
283.
by iaw 6y ago
The very first tweet is enough to draw into question the entire narrative: "Hunter Biden, who lives in Los Angeles, decides to fly 3000 miles across country, to drop off 3 MacBook Pros at a repair shop run by a blind guy who charges th
284.
by iaw 6y ago
He started talking once Scalia died.
285.
by iaw 6y ago
> Do they block tabloids as well? NY Post is a tabloid FYI.
286.
Clarence Thomas is begging someone to sue over Section 230(slate.com)
23 points by iaw 6y ago|44 comments
287.
N.H. Announces It Will Sue Massachusetts over Cross-Border Income Tax Collection(nhpr.org)
107 points by iaw 6y ago|136 comments
288.
by iaw 6y ago
- Porn star payoffs - Tax fraud - Admissions of sexual assault on tape - Tax fraud - Credible allegations of rape or sexual misconduct (26) - Lying to the American public about the threat of covid (on tape) What do you want to call it?
289.
by iaw 6y ago
In my defense, that article was published around the time I was writing the comment. If I see the DKIM I'll start buying that there's smoke but until then I don't trust the messengers.
290.
by iaw 6y ago
Funny, the left says the same thing about the right being in denial about supporting a morally corrupt president.
291.
by iaw 6y ago
The conclusion of the investigation was that it wasn't reasonable to indict a sitting President not that nothing illegal happened. In fact, the wording danced right up to the fact that something illegal did happen but the President
292.
by iaw 6y ago
I think we're seeing Twitter and Facebook draw a line in the sand about behaviors that cause damage. Note that Twitter and Facebook removed comments hoping for the worst when the president was diagnosed with Covid which they hadn&#x27
293.
by iaw 6y ago
Nope. Water has a surface that basically applies force relative to how fast you're going. If you go slow the water displaces and nothing happens, if yo slap the water it stings your hand, if you hit the water at terminal velocity you
294.
by iaw 6y ago
Only one side has come up with 'alternative facts' and argued that conclusive science is 'still out'. I've seen hypocrisy on both sides for sure but the intellectual dishonesty is only coming from one.
295.
by iaw 6y ago
Google the following terms: - Litvinenko - Novichok - Crimean Annexation - Russia Wikileaks (the Atlantic article is a good intro) - Sergei Magnitsky, the Magnitsky Act, Russian Meeting at Trump Tower (in that order tells the story) - Russi
296.
by iaw 6y ago
There were ten investigations and your version of events are not accurate according to all of them. Including the ones led by Republicans. [0] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Benghazi_attack#Investiga...
297.
by iaw 6y ago
Fast & Furious was a scandal (albeit a small one). There's a couple of other posters that outline things that should have been scandals but it's not that the media never reported it, it's that the public didn't get
298.
by iaw 6y ago
Fast & Furious was indeed a scandal as you and others have rightly pointed out but other than that I think we disagree on what a scandal is, I think there needs to be general public outrage for a scandal and we didn't see that exce
299.
by iaw 6y ago
My primary concern is about whether the information I'm looking at is factual or not. If Russia had proof of corruption on the candidate they did not excessively favor then I would be interested. When historic propagandists have &quot
300.
by iaw 6y ago
Maybe the companies that have been accused of allowing misinformation to spread and disrupt the democratic process are making an active effort to "do something" rather than further contribute to the problem.

More ›