ianhedoesit

3 ms·

1.
by ianhedoesit 11y ago
Isn't this still a useful feature? You still at least have a better idea of where to look compared to C. With the feature of `unsafe` blocks in Rust you have points of entry to look at, and can be relatively sure that you only need to
2.
by ianhedoesit 11y ago
I think this StackExchange question is pretty useful. http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/107687/what-i...
3.
by ianhedoesit 11y ago
I think what yason was trying to say is that how it currently works isn't the best option, but neither are obvious alternatives, such as making it a financial investment to send takedown notices.
4.
by ianhedoesit 12y ago
Ah, great. Thank you. I still find it a bit odd how they have made the connection, especially with a language that doesn't have that much adoption. But maybe that's why I don't work for Microsoft.
5.
by ianhedoesit 12y ago
I can't find an accompanying article or anything for this. I'm curious as to why Microsoft would put something like this out? Why make the comparison in the first place? Why compare it to Swift? Also, the code at http:/&#x2F
6.
by ianhedoesit 12y ago
I would imagine it was more of the opposite scenario. Rather than calling your girlfriend when you forget to lock your house, you might want to just lock it remotely.
7.
by ianhedoesit 12y ago
I have never seen anywhere require "Address Line 2." It's only used as a specifier to the address when there are multiple units at the address (office buildings, apartments, and the like).
8.
by ianhedoesit 12y ago
The major difference I've found is that /d is more akin to *nix symlinks with few exceptions, and /j is an NTFS-specific, local-only, directory link. Links made with the /d option can be files or directories to local or