Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
iamkrystian17
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
iamkrystian17
8mo ago
The containerized approach sounds interesting, I would definitely check it out
2.
▲
by
iamkrystian17
8mo ago
Where do you store your Claude/GPT skills? Inside .codex/.claude? If so you could tell them to put it under .ai/skills and lnai would symlinked them to .codex/.claude configs. Single source of truth
3.
▲
by
iamkrystian17
8mo ago
It is not really an agent package manager. It is a tool to sync agents configs. I checked out agent-resources, cool idea, maybe if lnai gains some traction I could contribut to your tool so it supports importing skills to .ai/ :)
4.
▲
by
iamkrystian17
8mo ago
Agents.md is usually only a part of ai coding tool config. LNAI handles syncing additional configs like skills, sub-dir rules, mcps, permissions to every tool. Additionally, even thought AGENTS.md is popular, not every tool supports that st
5.
▲
by
iamkrystian17
8mo ago
Yup with simple AGENTS file and skills, tools like ruler/lnai might be an overkill. However I still think that they are needed for MCPs/Permissions/sub-dir rules/different skills formats. I would really like all AI agent
6.
▲
by
iamkrystian17
8mo ago
At a glance there are a few differences: - LNAI additionally supports permissions - The way rules for sub-directories are defined is different. Ruler defines rules for sub-directories in the sub-directories themselves under ‘.ruler/‘.
7.
▲
by
iamkrystian17
8mo ago
Fair point. LNAI does support per-tool config overrides in .ai/.{codex/claude/cursor/etc.} directories, so you kind of get the best of both worlds :) You can sync identical configs, while having the flexibility to define
8.
▲
by
iamkrystian17
8mo ago
For simple config files like AGENTS.md/skills that is true. But some configs like MCPs/Permissions/Rules require transformations per tool. On lnai's per-tool docs pages (e.g. https://lnai.sh/tools/co
9.
▲
by
iamkrystian17
8mo ago
Totally valid take. Models might have different prompting guidelines for best results. If a developer uses one tool and wants to optimize their config as much as possible for that specific tool, LNAI is probably not for them. However given
10.
▲
by
iamkrystian17
8mo ago
For files that don't need transformation (AGENTS.md, skills, most rules), LNAI creates symlinks. .claude/CLAUDE.md → ../.ai/AGENTS.md. Edit the source, all tools see it immediately. For transformed files (Cursor's .
11.
▲
by
iamkrystian17
8mo ago
Yes, the tool takes that into account and transforms mcps/permissions/rules to different tool formats. Sadly some tools might not support fine-grained permissions (e.g. Codex) in which case a warning will be displayed but everythi
12.
▲
LNAI – Define AI coding tool configs once, sync to Claude, Cursor, Codex, etc.
(github.com)
70 points
by
iamkrystian17
8mo ago
|
30 comments
13.
▲
by
iamkrystian17
8mo ago
I've been using Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex on the same projects. Each tool has its own config format: Claude wants `.claude/`, Cursor wants `.cursor/`, Codex wants `.codex/`. Every time I updated a skill/rule, I