hypfer

19 ms·

391.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Why? Certainly not unattended, but no AI should ever be unattended. But if you closely guide it, support it with tools like Ghidra and force force force force force a process with many sanity checks and quintuple-checks, it's possible.
392.
by hypfer 4mo ago
I'm just greatly annoyed that a conversation that could've been about understanding and learning was (at least attempted to be) hijacked/derailed by some ego/identity stuff. Letting people get away with that has led to t
393.
by hypfer 4mo ago
So you're saying the cutting edge HDR features(?) in windows 11 are not all that important to you personally and thus do not warrant windows 11 usage? Makes sense, yeah. Nice talking to you.
394.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Yes and how many of those people have the cash for cutting edge tech? And how much does that cutting edge tech truly matter for the core game experience. I think the steam hardware survey might have some answers there and can tell us for wh
395.
by hypfer 4mo ago
At this point, you might want to consider throwing an LLM at it and just letting it reimplement the thing so that it runs on linux. They can actually do that. They may not like it, but they can.
396.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Most people are in fact not gamers. Like.. at all. And even those that are probably don't own an OLED or mini-LED monitor. Most people just want a computer that does the word, the chrome and that's about it.
397.
by hypfer 4mo ago
I mean to be fair, with the business models, incentives, compensation, etc. being how they have been, why would you care? Why would you do the hard work when you can also just not do that? I mean I agree with "people are not suited for
398.
by hypfer 4mo ago
I think people saw that old culture and thought "man, that's horrible. We must never do that". And the assessment was right, but also wrong. Previously, shame (and other pressure) was just applied without first empathically i
399.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Yes and no. Yes in general, because usually it's culture and not an individual failing. No in specific situations, because it's not just culture but also some people are just the weakest link. Only focusing on either of these whil
400.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Genuine question: If it was actually deserved, why does it bother you?
401.
by hypfer 4mo ago
> You will encounter business decisions you think are terrible but you still have to sell to your team. This is incorrect. You don't have to. In fact, you shouldn't. There can be situation in which stuff will need to happen reg
402.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Nah, it's not "the wrong people" but "the wrong purpose" with the purpose being no purpose or rather just "looking good on social media". Which, don't get me wrong, is generally fine, because not ever
403.
by hypfer 4mo ago
> but I'm working around that in my harness. How?
404.
by hypfer 4mo ago
A person with the exact kind of pattern matching brain disorder this tech has been modeled after. I do make mistakes though. Please check results.
405.
by hypfer 4mo ago
I remember a time where a product didn't suddenly get worse while you were blinking. That was a nice time. Let us get back to that time. Use open weights models. Own stuff.
406.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Oh I am sure that it became somewhat more accurate, and with that, the labeling there is in fact technically correct. It just does not work as an explainer for the doomsday-ish hype that model has induced in a lot of people's brains. T
407.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Wait but that has been the exact word-for-word complaint when comparing sonnet to opus Or opus to opus Or really any new thing to old thing
408.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Wait, so.. This is interesting. The "reported to me like a colleague" part. Is it just that anthropic gave Mythos even more of that Anthropic™ character, (incorrectly) radiating confidence? Is that why people have been losing thei
409.
by hypfer 4mo ago
I'm sorry, but.. are you being serious? Yes. Yes. The only way one can write secure software is by always using the latest SOTA model. Anything else is inefficient and vulnerable. I hate this platform
410.
by hypfer 4mo ago
> But… the models will fall behind. Yes but why does that matter? If I am happy with its capabilities now, I will continue being happy with its capabilities in the future. Yes, it cannot do the newest magic shit, but why does that matter
411.
by hypfer 4mo ago
> if I am accessing an open model via hosted API, I might as well run a closed model via hosted API. uh.. no? The whole thing is that it cannot be enshittified, because there's not just a single party having control over it. As it h
412.
by hypfer 4mo ago
It doesn't actually make sense tho. It just "makes sense" within the rules of a fundamentally nonsensical system. That system however is no law of nature. It's just broken nonsense no one bothers to fix because we haven&
413.
by hypfer 4mo ago
I think not. I believe that post is bullshit written _by_ the oppressor (if you allow me to use that lingo which you won't but I don't care). Hence this is on-topic. But interesting, isn't it? The moment someone questions the
414.
by hypfer 4mo ago
I find the term "burnout" in context of FOSS quite infuriating, as it is usually being used to invalidate a real problem. Instead of talking about concrete misbehavior by concrete individuals or institutions, "oh that poor gu
415.
by hypfer 4mo ago
That writeup is completely unhinged and utterly incomprehensible to follow. It just throws "you can do <large number>" at you, with no real explainer regarding how it manages that and which trade-offs are made. I still don&#
416.
by hypfer 4mo ago
> I have multiple long sessions with opus (not as many with fable as it got taken down quickly) where it keeps fighting me on problems, sayings "that's not how it works" / "that is not possible", followed b
417.
by hypfer 4mo ago
FWIW it told me stuff about openfaas. Now I know how to mentally file it and how to mentally file the author. The GitHub profile alone might not have sent the same signal, so this is useful. Is it bad software? Idk. Probably not. Should you
418.
by hypfer 4mo ago
That was a lot of text for me still having no idea what the point of the author was (beside what I can infer from the headline that is). I do however now know that they're a totally cool dude building stuff physically and as software +
419.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Neat! Now do it the other way round and make the 8 bit cpus become a 2nd year EE student.
420.
by hypfer 4mo ago
How people cope with their delusion is irrelevant tho. They're delusional. They must stop

More ›