hypfer

22 ms·

421.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Yes but that means that it is lying in people's face. Really just straight-up lying. No fancy words to soften it. Just lies. Lying is bad.
422.
by hypfer 4mo ago
You seem to be mistaking the "rules" of the ZIRP SV nonsense bubble for the rules of reality. Understandably so, but still.
423.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Feels like a category error. It's a slide deck telling people what a product can do (that's a normal thing to release for a company), but the thing it tries to sell you on is building your own business based on their tool. Which m
424.
by hypfer 4mo ago
This morning I have been blessed with an example of the exact behavior that is so infuriating. > But re-reading the comment: > "In the real world however, it does not. Hence, in the future we might fail this check even if it work
425.
by hypfer 4mo ago
I don't really like them tbh. They are a lot faster, yes, but at least for my needs, they feel a lot dumber too. It's a shame that the gemma4 that _would_ fit 24GB VRAM is MoE. :(
426.
by hypfer 4mo ago
I've paid ~2k€ in 2023. Since I'm usually sitting next to it, I'm only using it when I want to use it. It can get quite loud and warm. Crypto (to my knowledge at least) moved away from GPU mining. I guess you could maybe rent
427.
by hypfer 4mo ago
The same 24GB VRAM RTX 4090 I bought to play Cyberpunk 2077 with. Works perfectly fine in llama.cpp throwing 70+t/s at me with 128k q8 K/V context when using the IQ4_NL quant + MTP at q4 MTP K/V. Also leaving this here becaus
428.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Opus in my experience is equally unpleasant "character"-wise, but at least it actually gets stuff done more often, so it's at least slightly more earned at that. It's still a neurotic cargo-culting dogmatic idiot, but on
429.
by hypfer 4mo ago
After having been a happy user of Qwen3.6-27B for a few weeks, due to being away from the hardware, I'm currently forced to use Claude Sonnet 4.6 It is such a downgrade. I don't understand how that's even possible. The thing
430.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Reminds me of all of those ethics debates back when fully self driving cars were basically already here ca 10 years ago. The ones talking about how hard it would be to chose which person to run over. Additionally, I find it hard to believe
431.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Would you be happier if I wrote "the prompts"? Would that change anything about the fundamental cliche-ness here? Also, no, I'm not clever, but not sure what that has to do with this comment chain.
432.
by hypfer 4mo ago
I'm really just tired of all these "projects" that in the end just turn out to be Claude. There is no need to put this code on GitHub. Everyone with an API key can achieve the same if you hand them the prompt. This is like co
433.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Hacker news is full of people having given up, building torment nexii and coping/rationalizing _incredibly_ hard. So while I agree that privilege is certainly a factor, so is what I've just said. A lot of people here live very cus
434.
by hypfer 4mo ago
While this industry surely is frustrating and full of pitiful fraudsters, I don't think that what you're saying is fair or leading us anywhere. Most of our stuff in this world actually does work, and the reason why it does is that
435.
by hypfer 4mo ago
I mean I am no expert, but to me it sounds like the org you're describing seems to lean away from the "engineering" side of things and into the "org for the sake of org". Which might not be ideal, because "orgi
436.
by hypfer 4mo ago
That does sound like a bad org tho, sorry to say that. Not to disagree of course that time is limited, but in my experience, optimizing it this harshly leads to poor results, because eventually, you just get leapfrogged by reality. Hyper-op
437.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Okay I see thank you. But that sounds more like "evasive" is the problematic attribute and not "long winding". Which does show up at the same time often, true. But not always.
438.
by hypfer 4mo ago
> Any long-winded answer to a question is immediate out and has been for years. Why? If the winding path is actually interesting and gives you insights into how the person works, why would that be a bad thing?
439.
by hypfer 4mo ago
If whoever is hiring is actually good at their job: yes. That is of course assuming that they're looking for some long-term stable team member. A skilled interviewer smells dishonesty. However, and to be fair, whether and how they act
440.
by hypfer 4mo ago
That's why I said "mostly"
441.
by hypfer 4mo ago
On a humanity-level: yes. On an individual state-level: no.
442.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Acknowledging that my perception might be skewed because there are still a ton of social safety nets in place. The same might not be true everywhere.
443.
by hypfer 4mo ago
I mean maybe that is because I live in a still mostly not failed state (Germany), but I can't imagine that these things would be _so bad_ that living in fear of saying the wrong thing would be something worth considering. Plus, and lea
444.
by hypfer 4mo ago
> have 2 kids or fewer This is at odds with lots of other relevant topics that go beyond just "consumption". 2 or fewer is below the replacement rate of 2.1 This _has_ already happened, but there are a lot of voices voicing a l
445.
by hypfer 4mo ago
> It's tough to answer because you want to hedge for both an AI enthused employer and an AI hesitant employer with limited information about who they are and how they personally use these products. Have you considered just answering
446.
by hypfer 4mo ago
This is an absolutely crazy wasteful thing to do considering the actual cost of all that inference and nothing to be proud of.
447.
by hypfer 4mo ago
I have an even better proposal. We'll just use you!
448.
by hypfer 4mo ago
I've been wondering for a while if ignoring most of that bubble and whatever it cooks up might be a wrong move on my part. Glad to see that it's just noise. I suppose the biggest effects these skills have is to prime the user to e
449.
by hypfer 4mo ago
Don't yield then. Don't endlessly reply.
450.
by hypfer 4mo ago
My man, this thread has already achieved the intended outcome (or has just temporally coexisted). There is no need to argue anymore. Enjoy your computers.

More ›