hypfer

16 ms·

331.
by hypfer 2mo ago
I would be curious if this can do moderation with an arbitrary ruleset, or if it's just "that one moderation style" we already know from current big tech platforms. The kind where malicious intent is okay if the words are nic
332.
by hypfer 3mo ago
Yes, yes, but you see, it's also an arsonist right-wing mob running amok in the real world. Repeatedly! I mean I get it. This is terrifying. But that's exactly my point.
333.
by hypfer 3mo ago
Uuuh idk man. I'm just seeing this stuff. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_Kingdom_riots https://www.dw.com/en/racist-riots-break-out-across-united-k... But glad to learn that there
334.
by hypfer 3mo ago
Hm. I mean I would wish that your observation is correct, but I kinda doubt it. Doesn't match what I am seeing outside of the Internet. But, regardless of that, I still believe that shorthand terms and indirection are a less clean solu
335.
by hypfer 3mo ago
Fix to what? Sorry to say, but that word probably has an equally low impact on regular people by now. Worse if we look at what people actually think/vote/etc. People by now at large seem to be rather fine with both being called ra
336.
by hypfer 3mo ago
> One could argue that fascist run FOSS projects might be working against your interest as a user. I guess so, but that's abstract and hard to grasp for most people. "The guy has clearly lost it and thus is probably not making
337.
by hypfer 3mo ago
I think more precise terminology would go a long way here. What is "a fascist" (in context of being labelled that on the interwebs). That could mean a lot of things. As a reader, you learn basically nothing about DHH other than th
338.
by hypfer 3mo ago
Those two twitter links with people that got hospitalized might just be people trying to get their 5 seconds of internet fame by (pretending to be) doing something dumb. So taking it at face value is kinda part of the problem here. The only
339.
by hypfer 3mo ago
Dude this is the funniest comment I've read this month. Thank you
340.
by hypfer 3mo ago
Cool, so now that open weight models are closing in on SOTA, SOTA enshittifies. Now for the crash
341.
by hypfer 3mo ago
My ancestors are smiling at me, Imperials. Can you say the same?
342.
by hypfer 3mo ago
Well, yeah. No one does. But, also, as said, you're an industry (and foss!) veteran, so I find it impossible to believe that you haven't had your fair share of baseless bullshit being thrown at you, and with that, you gaining a pe
343.
by hypfer 3mo ago
It's both. I agree to rednb that at this point it feels like rather obvious brand building, but also, I agree with you that some value is in it. It does not feel all that authentic though, and it's good to react allergically to la
344.
by hypfer 3mo ago
> They want to turn LLMs into a commodity, and watch the US AI labs crash and burn. Man, imagine Darios face when suddenly, he cannot decide anymore what other people consensually do with their own hardware in their free time. Rumpelstil
345.
by hypfer 3mo ago
> it seems to respect user's choice of "prefers reduced motion". Cool, that I didn't check, because it is impossible to enable that setting, as it breaks _huge_ amounts of websites. I'm not aware of a way to enab
346.
by hypfer 3mo ago
This new trend of content appearing while scrolling down is so terrible accessibility-wise, I do not understand how Mozilla of all institutions would do it. Not every trend needs to be followed. Have some backbone. You receive donations to
347.
by hypfer 3mo ago
To be exactly that guy: This cannot happen if you do not do this renting at variable rates. A thing you own doesn't suddenly bill you trillions of dollars in error. It doesn't hyperscale either, but neither do you.
348.
by hypfer 3mo ago
Aren't all conferences just huge piles of cognitive dissonance? At least the "industry" ones used for "networking" and all that other crap. Where's the news here? And why does the author not take a step back an
349.
by hypfer 3mo ago
> Using a code agent involves editing big chunks of multi-line text, and getting hosed with information that you need to scan, navigate, and understand. I find a terminal UX horrible for all those tasks, and Juggler is resolutely a GUI a
350.
by hypfer 3mo ago
As opposed to dang wearing the HN hat.
351.
by hypfer 3mo ago
Well I mean for starters, one might disagree whether all members of "the community" should actually be part of it/be catered to. I mean it's kinda hard to kick out the VC brainrot get-rich-quick sanity-is-tertiary scum w
352.
by hypfer 3mo ago
> Because value of a project is not in the code produced. It's in the amount of battle-testing that code has seen. Rel: https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2000/04/06/things-you-should-...
353.
by hypfer 3mo ago
Cool tech, but the writing flags as AI. em dash, staccato no thing 1, no thing 2, just thing 3 __ Please don't harm your work like this. Let it speak for itself + add your authentic voice.
354.
by hypfer 3mo ago
Completely meta and possibly out-of-place, but this thread was I think my first encounter with dang (the human), and, based on it, I'm filled with respect for him. Good job being you. Please continue doing so.
355.
by hypfer 3mo ago
> I want to run a model comparable to today’s SOTA. It says so in the quoted text, yes.
356.
by hypfer 3mo ago
I feel like this is kinda sorta to be expected. Every time someone actively approaches you with an offer to spend their real energy and lifetime on your thing, It's almost always about leverage in some way. At least if there is actual
357.
by hypfer 3mo ago
That's because we haven't yet started to laugh people out of the room that get uneasy and complain when the rate of updates of something starts slowing down.
358.
by hypfer 3mo ago
Are you sure that minecraft pioneered that model? It is certainly a very well-known instance of it, but pioneered?
359.
by hypfer 3mo ago
Dude that animation sucks so much I could not believe that there was no way of disabling that without disabling _all_ animations. The fact that it makes content move in a way that is illegal breaks my mind. You try to check "is this th
360.
by hypfer 3mo ago
> But you haven't really delved into that. Dude, are you also playing that script or what? Of course you do not engage on the level the possibly malicious party wants you to engage, because if you do that, you play their game by the

More ›