Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hypeatei
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
56 ms
·
691.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
Well, Starbucks for example has separate areas for preparing mobile orders so they're not being mixed in with others. My point was that (generally) you have an idea how long you'll be waiting when ordering the traditional way and
692.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
With mobile ordering it's hard to tell where you are in the queue or where you will be I guess. In the drive thru, at least you can see how many people are in front of you and they're making orders chronologically.
693.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
Not a chance in this administration. Trump pardoned a Navy SEAL war criminal in 2019[0]. > Gallagher was convicted in July of posing with the dead body of a teenage Islamic State captive he had just killed with a hunting knife. He was gr
694.
▲
Trump to Sign Order Renaming the Defense Department as the Department of War
(nytimes.com)
25 points
by
hypeatei
1y ago
|
25 comments
695.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
The engines are open source, no? I don't think we should break websites on purpose but keeping everything backwards compatible does seem untenable for decades to come.
696.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
UTF-16 will be quite the mountain as Windows APIs and web specifications/engines default to it for historical reasons.
697.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
It doesn't negate the advantage of 2FA. There are so many scenarios that don't involve your entire password manager database being leaked in plaintext. In that case, you likely have much more to worry about considering the attacke
698.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
> Don’t let sky high stock market fool you The simplest explanation for higher stock prices is that the dollar has lost ~9% of its value this year (see: DXY)
699.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
That statement is pointless. Anything in isolation can be "good", just like if someones house burned down you could say that having insurance was "good" but it ignores the bigger picture.
700.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
I'm glad to see people in this thread saying that this will be an environmental win while we're ending subsidies for "Unreliable, Foreign-Controlled Energy Sources"[0] and "Reinvigorating America’s Beautiful Clean C
701.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
Secret courts already exist: it's called FISA.
702.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
This would be hard to do given sovereign immunity. I highly doubt you'd get them to waive their immunity for an "official act" done by the President. The FTCA does allow for some exceptions but it's pretty narrow.
703.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
That would require even more R&D to maybe be useful in a rare situation. Like you mentioned, the vulnerability surface would increase. The last you thing you'd want is a remote control vuln being discovered in your $200M jet duri
704.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
The government can't solve for everything at all times. That's why free markets exist and are important. You could have the best most awesome helmet safety regulation get passed on Friday and have it completely blown up by a new
705.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
I hope for the same thing, but it's still sad to see the point we've reached where some people actively cheer these actions on or don't treat them with the seriousness they deserve.
706.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
This comment was very informative, thanks. It's really disappointing to see a seemingly new wave of people cheering on isolationism/protectionism. Maybe some have valid concerns for certain products that we don't make ourselv
707.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
Guardrails won't always hold. The Supreme Court is stacked with Trump appointees. That, and they don't have any real enforcement power anyway.
708.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
> without giving the game away that the United States is now fully embracing authoritarianism. The multiple civil suits that Trump is engaging in as president against pollsters and news organizations for saying things he doesn't l
709.
▲
Trump signs order aimed at ending cashless bail, flag burning
(washingtonpost.com)
6 points
by
hypeatei
1y ago
|
5 comments
710.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
https://archive.is/FHghI
711.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
> did not specify what those security concerns are. Of course not. Just scream "national security!!" and you're allowed to do anything in this country. Trump did this with the tariffs as well. I don't understand why t
712.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
> It saves you a bunch of money and time and also trouble and worry if you can move from checking bags to not checking bags This has been my experience, too. Some airports have a half-assed process where it's partially self-service
713.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
It's probably to avoid mass flagging of anything mentioning "Trump" Some don't like their dear leader being shown in a negative light here.
714.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
The "magic cue" sounds like Windows CoPilot but isn't getting the same backlash for some reason. Why would I want AI tightly woven into everything I'm doing on my phone? Seems like a privacy nightmare.
715.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
Ah, okay. I guess that's another one I'll add to the list of hostile actions towards the web then. I completely understand the security and maintenance burdens that they're bringing up but breaking sites would be unacceptable
716.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
This proposal seems to be aimed at removing native support in favor of a WASM-based polyfill (like PDF.js, I guess) which seems reasonable? Google definitely throws its weight around too much w.r.t. to web standards, but this doesn't
717.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
> There are 340 million or so people in the United States - what’s the human capital problem? As I mentioned, the unemployment rate is already low. Looking at total population numbers is a fools errand since not every single person is ab
718.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
With the US unemployment rate being so low, with birth rates below replacement levels, and with anti-immigration sentiment: how do proponents of "bring everything back" plan to deal with the human capital problem? Besides that, br
719.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
These tariff powers are given for emergency use only under the IEEPA, so you're being disingenuous IMO. I don't think most reasonable people would see what's going on with Trump cooking up a "national emergency" ove
720.
▲
by
hypeatei
1y ago
You're aware that he served a first term where you could've looked at his track record with deficit spending, correct? Before COVID, while the economy was doing good, Trump was still spending government money like crazy. See: htt
More ›