hydra-f

5 ms·

1.
by hydra-f 4mo ago
As per OpenRouter: Input Price $10/M tokens Output Price $50/M tokens Cache Read $1/M tokens Cache Write $12.50/M tokens 2x Claude Opus 4.8, same as Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) Frankly, not even Opus 4.8 would be enough of an
2.
by hydra-f 4mo ago
Yes, and the price reflects that
3.
by hydra-f 4mo ago
How much and what kind of data do you need to throw at these models to get a good design interface?
4.
by hydra-f 4mo ago
Not yet. I am slowly gathering resources for it, mapping out the commands, toolset and the overall UX. As well as handling the whole project management part. I decided to exercise a bit of patience to see what other people achieve through t
5.
by hydra-f 4mo ago
Extensibility has a cost which affects all my earlier points. Pi is fine for testing things you might include in your harness, but that's where I would draw the line
6.
by hydra-f 4mo ago
What makes pi so awesome? It feels as though the whole thing is held together with tape. Poor performance, poor UX. Security is an afterthought. Not that versatile (as of yet). You certainly are better off writing your own personal harness.
7.
by hydra-f 4mo ago
Completely different philosophies. I will share a TL/DR below: MY KANBAN CLI IS: A project management system to plan, estimate, track sprints, measure velocity, assign roles, and give agents structured tasks with acceptance criteria. C
8.
by hydra-f 4mo ago
Hello! Completely local, nothing leaves your machine
9.
by hydra-f 4mo ago
You're either thinking of a service, an electron app or a platform. Which would be just a big of a gap as GitHub is to Git Even a local browser interface would bloat the core tool with unnecessary maintenance and complexity. I love a g
10.
by hydra-f 4mo ago
Models still introduce hallucinations in the copy, which proves to be rather hard to control, even with the Pablo tool's output. Still, miles better than what you can achieve by normal prompting. The website I tried was https:/&#
11.
by hydra-f 4mo ago
Yes, any agent can authenticate using its model name. The tool automatically tracks the who, when, and what for all actions. For monitoring, it comes with local analytics and high-level statistics across the entire board. It logs exactly ho
12.
by hydra-f 4mo ago
It's model-agnostic, so anything works. As long as the model is good at instruction following, it won't have issues with using the tool (and the AGENTS.md workflow).
13.
by hydra-f 4mo ago
Thank you! Looking forward to it!
14.
Show HN: Kanban CLI (A local-first, agent-first task manager for the terminal)(codeberg.org)
17 points by hydra-f 4mo ago|13 comments
15.
by hydra-f 5mo ago
Yes, since the former part relates to me as the individual (as I get the benefits of an open source project) The latter is about the contributors that can no longer reap the benefits of OSS, since the amount of noise (e.g. low quality contr
16.
by hydra-f 5mo ago
Thank you!
17.
by hydra-f 5mo ago
A lefthook: format: glob: " .rs" run: cargo fmt -- --check lint: glob: " .rs" run: cargo clippy -- -D warnings tests: run: cargo test audit: run: cargo audit + hooks that shove the lefthook automa
18.
by hydra-f 5mo ago
How does swival.dev compare to a diy agent harness like pi.dev or do they serve different purposes, since swival ships with the "extensions" by default?
19.
by hydra-f 5mo ago
You're saying the world is in a sad state today , but there never was a time more prosperous than today on a global stage. Almost everything reeks of prosperity If there's anything to blame, it's the various cultural revolut
20.
by hydra-f 5mo ago
Anything can be ground for opportunism and the world has no lack of that. It seems clear to me that whatever the direction may be, it's a shitty direction nonetheless
21.
by hydra-f 5mo ago
By unifying the billing and quota systems, as well as providing better integration, I presume The Antigravity harness is by far better than the gemini-cli one. Antigravity also offers models other than Gemini as well. When you say Antigravi
22.
by hydra-f 5mo ago
I didn't take the price into consideration when writing that. I meant to point out that even if they have similar scores, the Flash model might be smaller than MiMo or Kimi, which would by itself be a win That said, haste makes waste a
23.
by hydra-f 5mo ago
Same old issue with Gemini models trying to "enrich" everything
24.
by hydra-f 5mo ago
It has to be a larger model, wouldn't make much sense otherwise. That isn't to say the price isn't artificially increased as well The Antigravity harness is really well done, so I do agree it's their strong suit. Can&#x2
25.
by hydra-f 5mo ago
That really depends on whether they have similar parameter counts, doesn't it? Unless you know that, the comparison is just strange
26.
by hydra-f 5mo ago
Unlike LLMs which made it into the public view, I have a hard time seeing these world simulation models doing the same I'm not sure how to imagine their use in education or gaming, but it's clear that they have a real potential fo
27.
by hydra-f 5mo ago
Vision has become totally underappreciated, whereas I believe it brings important advantages to a model Also, a big caveat in using Qwen models has always been its speech patterns. I do wonder how Google made the Gemma lineup so good at thi
28.
by hydra-f 5mo ago
Beside the poorly written post, the vulnerability discovery workflow might actually give good results
29.
by hydra-f 5mo ago
Handholding is an issue which is affected by 3 factors: the model, the tooling and the human expertise. Out of the three, the last is the weakest link, due to the fact that it takes the longest to nurture. Once tooling (e.g. agent harnesses
30.
by hydra-f 5mo ago
I'm not the guy in question, but I can offer a few pointers other than the ones I did in my other message. Tailor things to make them your own. First, imagine the kind of workflow you want. Take a pen and a paper and map it out. Second

More ›