huzur79

3 ms·

1.
by huzur79 14y ago
Well its public now isn't it. Isn't that the problem. What harm would a screen shot do. Can black out anything that is sensitive.
2.
by huzur79 14y ago
yup due to a friend that puts way to much value in posters opinions here vs using logic and his own mind. People are jumping the bandwaggon of facebook hate on something that isn't verified based on reports that make a lot more sense that i
3.
by huzur79 14y ago
And yet not one person has posted any evidence. Not one screen shoot. Which has been asked by a few people already. Show me the screen shots. Show me the screen shots.
4.
by huzur79 14y ago
Post a screen shot, lets see it.
5.
by huzur79 14y ago
Oh its false and not real, did that even occur to you or is your hate of facebook so intense that this possibility that users could be mistaken is just not possible. You know the very same people who gladly give up a ton of personal informa
6.
by huzur79 14y ago
If it is indeed verified I would be the first one to jump on the bandwaggon and delete the account and tell others to do so. But so far I have not seen anything to verify it and more reports on Facebook claims that it is indeed old user to
7.
by huzur79 14y ago
Hum http://techcrunch.com/2012/09/24/reports-facebook-users-seei... "TechCrunch has investigated more, and we have found no evidence that the allegedly exposed posts were actually private messages. Their email receipts show they were in f
8.
by huzur79 14y ago
Can at least one person making these claims actually show any real proof about this? Just one person. I mean if its such a major flaw and verifiable I would expect at least one screen shoot showing this to be the case.