hutrdvnj

13 ms·

91.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
Exactly, then Putin himself could go to Washington kill Biden and everyone is doing nothing because of MAD. That's absurd.
92.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
The US has thousands of US soldiers in EU NATO states, do you think US will just sit there and talk about financial sanctions while Putin kills US troops in Europe? By the way Germany also has nukes, not their own ones, but they are not jus
93.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
What do you suggest? ICBM launch silos in Germany and hypersonic missile launchers?
94.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
> And? They can't actually respond militarily because MAD. Of course they would respond. MAD is just a mad possibility we all have to accept. As soon as russia attacks NATO with conventional weapons it will fight back with conventio
95.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
> My imagination says: as soon as new facts are established (let's say blitz invation of a city), you are tempted to not respond because you don't want to start a world war. But how can you establish facts, when you have to kil
96.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
The US has troops in the eastern NATO states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania ...), more than ever and likely more to come. Biden made it very clear, if russians open fire on US troops (NATO), we have WW3.
97.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
They absolutely will, I have zero doubt. Because otherwise NATO would be completely pointless and this would strengthen Putin even more, making him an even bigger treat for western countries.
98.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
> It's because he thinks he can use nuclear weapons to get NATO to back down. When Putin intends to use nuclear weapons against NATO members, then the one and only answer that NATO will come up with is nuclear. This brings us either
99.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
Biden made it clear, if russians open fire on US troops (NATO), we have WW3.
100.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
I find it okay when you can click the ads away like it used to be for a long time, but now YouTube often forces you to watch the whole clip, sometimes even two.
101.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
Is btrfs stable yet?
102.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
Is it just me who thinks that plain SQL has won the SQL vs ORM battle? I mean why should I learn how to use X different ORM syntaxes in Y different languages and in addition to that lose full control over the actual query.
103.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
Yes, but you need someone with much bananas to build a big factory in order to match the demand.
104.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
> We don't have to settle for either. Well that's easy to say, but what's your suggestion to the problem?
105.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
But it's not that easy. These 10 extremely rich monkeys provide jobs (which convert to bananas at the end of the month) to millions. And these jobs do generate value to million of people. This is how capitalism work, of course you can
106.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
I think Android version is very important, this is often the first filter that I use in order to filter out older devices. Yes, I know there are older devices e.g. 3 year old Smartphones that can be upgraded to the latest Android, but I&#x2
107.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
If your problem can be solved neatly with some combination of existing shell utilities, and you just need a bit of glue to join them together, bash is great. The huge weakness of bash is the data mangling that is more complicated than a rel
108.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
Can someone explain to me why FreeBSD doesn't support 802.11ac?
109.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
Maybe think of it like: What if Haskell and Go had a child?
110.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
I think that Haskell2010 could be the last Haskell standard. Modern Haskell has diverged to such a degree that it seems to be (almost) impossible to define a common standard. Even if they would, as long as there a over 100 language extensio
111.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
I think it's called MAMAA instead of MAGMA these days.
112.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
React is becoming a boring technology and that's a good thing.
113.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
Sometimes I wonder if dang ever goes on vacation. Does he even sleep or take a break?
114.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
> it’s hard to dodge cheaters, even with Lichess’s cheat detection You can never be 100% certain, but there's a few things one can do. Before playing an opponent in correspondence check his profile. Never play against new accounts (
115.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
I think you were hitting some kind of limit regarding submits per day. I think if you were to throttle such a bot to maybe a few submissions from serious sources per week, then it would likely work. I would guess that many submissions to &#
116.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
Same here, except that I skim through reddit before /newest.
117.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
> Anyone going on about the climate and refuses to put nuclear energy at the forefront of the conversation is unserious and is only interested in virtual signaling in my opinion. I think it is unserious to call every other solution other
118.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
Often you don't have or don't want to spend the uninterrupted time to play a 15+15 match, this is why bullet and blitz are so popular. For those I recommend correspondence chess (e.g. on Lichess). This form of chess is asynchronou
119.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
Summary of each chapter from the Book: https://www.seagnotes.com/index.html
120.
by hutrdvnj 5y ago
I think the biggest problem with this is that Preact is not a 100% drop-in replacement for React. The devil is in the details. The programmers will casually follow online answers from stackoverflow or blog post regarding React and apply the

More ›