hurril

11 ms·

91.
by hurril 3y ago
You are missing the point completely here. I am not arguing for or against frameworks. I'm telling you that Java and Java programmers need them, and because of that you are going to have swathes of programmers fighting over which ones
92.
by hurril 3y ago
Not really. "I did Java in a serious project without frameworks once" is not a counter to: Java needs frameworks to be generally useful. I am not trying to convince anyone, I'm stating the case that Java and Java programmers
93.
by hurril 3y ago
No, dear Internet adversary. There is a reason why the framework landscape looks the way it does. You can see proof of my point in every job ad there is and frankly, I'm quite disappointed really. Cool companies and interesting ideas g
94.
by hurril 3y ago
You are answering a different question. Opting for Java is smart, albeit incredibly boring. Doing so is basically choosing to go with Spring Boot, at the same time. You are going to do that because the Java programmers need it, Java needs i
95.
by hurril 3y ago
Bah, cheap and weak. But sure, the hill is yours, strong warrior.
96.
by hurril 3y ago
Find me one company that uses either of the languages without a framework and you make your point. I'll wait.
97.
by hurril 3y ago
So cool of you!
98.
by hurril 3y ago
Wait - writing Java without a framework totally works if you begin by writing frameworks for everything it lacks? You are making my point, friend.
99.
by hurril 3y ago
Definitely! But not with Java and JavaScript.
100.
by hurril 3y ago
The difference in both of those cases are that you can create a micro framework yourself for the few abstractions that you need. (Not saying that you should!) Doing this with Java entails reflection and various other runtime extending toole
101.
by hurril 3y ago
If you were a CTO, would you have your team write the store backend in pure Java? Being able to solve AoC in it doesn't really matter.
102.
by hurril 3y ago
I don't think that cuts to the core of the problem. Java (and JavaScript) are too weak. The way you make them productive is by emulating strength through a framework; more than one way exists to Rome, however, so there will be differen
103.
by hurril 3y ago
You cannot build serious stuff in Java effectively without a framework. Choosing Java is choosing frameworks. The reasons are many, such as: Java programmers know Duplo, presented with Lego they are simply unable; Java is Duplo, presented w
104.
by hurril 3y ago
It's 0 and this fact is sometimes referred to as epsilon when we talk about parsing.
105.
by hurril 3y ago
I know what he said, the text is still there. I don't care what values people have, and the fact that you seem to have gone ahead and attached core values to me (opposite to those of the parent) is also interesting. It's intoleran
106.
by hurril 3y ago
It's just very intolerant in the actual sense of the word.
107.
by hurril 3y ago
Says the person who cannot live in a state bigger and more populous than many countries because he thinks they have the wrong core values. That speaks volumes about _you_. You are young and you have an ego problem, not a _other people'
108.
by hurril 3y ago
I agree with you! I dislike the name enum and really like how F# does it. In F#, everything is type and what kind of type you create comes down to the type construction literal you use. ` (* enum ) type 'a Option = Some of 'a |
109.
by hurril 3y ago
Except Haskell, Scala and F#. They are neither academic nor rabbitholes. You're simply not familiar with them - perhaps a trip outside of your safe space could be something? :) Car and crd is lisp and from the 60:ies, basically. You ca
110.
by hurril 3y ago
While I agree with you, I can understand going with enum so that they don't scare away the C and C++ crowd with being too fartsy with theoretic stuff.
111.
by hurril 3y ago
> A commonly said piece of feedback from someone who's learning Rust as a second language tends to be that enums are far better supported in Rust than any other language. This is nonsense. I doubt that this is common feedback and it
112.
by hurril 3y ago
This is one of my favourite fonts. Used to switch between it and Pragmata Pro before I got myself Berkeley Mono.
113.
by hurril 3y ago
macOS does not have a task bar and that paragraph specifically says that the flashing items did not even show in a news app. The criticism of Apple here says that they have a news app and that it shows news. It is not the same thing and it
114.
by hurril 3y ago
Then we don't understand the phrase "the same thing" the same way. An Apple box comes with Apple software and services. It does not come with third party apps preinstalled and it does not show me ads. The one exception that I
115.
by hurril 3y ago
Do you want me to understand a news app or widget as the same thing as unwarranted ads in the start menu?
116.
by hurril 3y ago
Yes, it does come with Apple Music (and whatever Apple News it - perhaps I've missed it?) And they do nag about using Apple Music a lot. I dislike that they do this and Apple can be criticised for a million different things. 1) this is
117.
by hurril 3y ago
But they don't do the exact same thing at all. One comes preloaded with apps you didn't choose and news or ads right on the task bar. Apple does none of that.
118.
by hurril 3y ago
I'm relatively new to Rust. I use panic (and cousins) in fn main only. As in: I'll expect(), unwrap() or similarly handle missing bootstrapping circumstances. Outside of main, I'll never ever use any of them. Even when I &quo
119.
by hurril 3y ago
Of course not. They would move countries to the currently best option.
120.
by hurril 3y ago
Downvote it all you want. I've spent the last decade writing in this style and to me it's second nature. Starting Rust I've had to basically relearn solving problems with loops and iterators. Solving problems with loops is no

More ›