Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hunter2_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
36 ms
·
601.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
Adware has always been a type of malware, even without polymorphic code or other evasion.
602.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
If what continues? People following a link from HN to Reddit? People updating uBlock when the reddit counter is >1000? I'm confused.
603.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
So if I asked enough industry people at CES what makes a smart TV smart, ultimately I would more often hear about things like motion interpolation than things like network connectivity?
604.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
I would say animals in images is more akin to matching two different musical performances of the same song (where one of the two can even be the user humming), which Shazam doesn't offer but some systems like Google Assistant do! Rathe
605.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
> Has anyone else not really been affected by the new youtube adblock policy at all? The megathread addresses this: > I've never seen this message. Is this because of my browser being X or Y? No, YouTube didn't roll this out
606.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
Yes, but I assume people would typically get to this website via the megathread [0] which says the same as you: > If it's red, it means we're either still working on a fix or the latest script didn't defeat our current fil
607.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
I could be wrong, but I interpreted gp as criticizing those who make the solutions available/easy, not those who use the solutions. The former are "trying to block" which takes time -- the latter simply block which is closer
608.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
I bet it's been used for stock/crypto trading for years already.
609.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
The number has climbed by almost 100 in the past couple of minutes. Interesting to see if the HN effect temporarily ruins your rule of thumb...
610.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
No worries; I only meant to comment on the headline within the work itself and didn't even notice a discrepancy!
611.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
Not too jargony, but it possibly conflates the regular calibration settings (brightness, contrast, etc.) which are actually worth tweaking because they let you get closer to the original signal. The settings this article discusses generally
612.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
I find the headline to be seriously clickbaity, as the word "smart" (in the context of TVs) generally refers to a network connection that facilitates streaming, telemetry, ads, etc. but TFA is not discussing that category of featu
613.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
Sounds like the mistake was implementing this exclusively in the screen reader instead of as a browser hotkey.
614.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
A casual reader may infer the same for both words, but "following" is much stronger. If I may take some liberties with usage: Following someone to a faraway place is much more likely to involve causation than going to that same pl
615.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
Maybe a regular Chromecast plugged into an HDMI audio extractor? They are super cheap on Amazon [0] though if using analog audio it might be worth trying a few to compare sound quality; optical should be perfect quality. [0] https:/&#
616.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
Does varying twist rate contribute to that uncertainty? I imagine that a cable with a high twist rate is slower because the twist means the individual conductors are longer (maybe just by a couple percent) than one with a lower twist rate.
617.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
Probably the same reason that grocery store shelves and circulars show the price with a loyalty card more prominently than the price without a loyalty card: since most people will end up paying that, it's a better number to use when co
618.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
You're looking at the second tab, "probable savings." Switch to the first tab, "purchase price," and the footnote changes from the one you quoted to this: > All prices are shown without incentives or est. 3-year
619.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
> I'd call Citi [...] "We'll NEVER call [...]" Those are 2 very different things! Indeed they did not call, you called. > yet you're on the phone with me That wording is specifically ambiguous as to who plac
620.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
Interesting. I feel like if you decide to share your OS session (and therefore your browser data which goes well beyond that cart: things like the passwords it offered to save!) all hope is already lost when it comes to isolation between us
621.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
Why would it matter if you take 1 minute or 1 day? Either way, the baseline expectation of functionality is for state to persist from one page request to the next page request, no matter how short or long that interval happens to be, and so
622.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
YouTube has videos of recent high speed chases in the US.
623.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
M-Audio Delta 1010 but it could probably be anything.
624.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
Whoa! I love it. For anyone wondering about the not-so-secret sauce: https://github.com/paprikka/butter/blob/main/src/watcher/det... The irony would be incredible if you happened to use Bard.
625.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
I used to have a computer with an audio interface that had a wordclock input (BNC connector) and a huge rack mounted wordclock (Antelope Isochrone) to theoretically reduce jitter that a cheap internal crystal clock built into an interface m
626.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
Yep. I'm not much of a religious person, but if I were, I might say: not only does AI not create stuff, humans don't either, only the Creator did! I suppose the big bang theory doesn't stray far from this either. Point is, ma
627.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
> the journalist FYI you're replying to the journalist.
628.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
I think that by that same logic, you could say human artists, writers, etc. don't create either, they just move existing matter (which typically isn't created nor destroyed) from one place to another. You could also say an electri
629.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
Would you say the same about all systems that are considered "generative"?
630.
▲
by
hunter2_
3y ago
It's an interesting claim that defeating xor requires a JS interpreter but defeating the others (e.g., concatenation, rot18, etc.) does not. I mean, if a bot author wanted to scrape a site or sites where all obfuscation used the same x
More ›