hungryhobo

13 ms·

91.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
Are you saying stocks are supposed to be riskless? And you are entitled to guaranteed gains?
92.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
He's also the one that got samsung where they are with semi fab.
93.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
that helps the chinese people how? i mean i see the benefit for americans, but how do you propose to get people in china to support this? if this view is commonly held by westerners then doesn't this just give the CCP more legitimacy?
94.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
accept that the tiranical, genocidal, dictatorial regime is appreciated by many in china.
95.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
i mean that's the point isn't it, in all the news about jack ma's disappearance, has any journalist tried to clarify the matter? NO, it's all speculation and journalists trying to create a narrative. So, jack ma has only
96.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
this is the correct answer. I think this is China's response after seeing Huawei getting blocked from using Google Services. Github is still owned by an american company and it has shown that it needs to comply with whatever foreign po
97.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
Hmm feels like a great tool to create echo chambers
98.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
because i don't think it'll hurt their bottom line? even if intel came back with their own fab, amd is not going to use intel fab, qualcomm is not gonna use intel fab. So this is just an extra source of revenue and it potentially
99.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
Piano is a notoriously difficult instrument even for regular music production, just because of its broad frequency range and harmonics are a pain to deal with. So kudos for zoom for at least making it sound palatable. I do wish there are mo
100.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
Do you know who funds ASPI? Let's just say the people who funds ASPI are the same people who blow people up in the middle east
101.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
because the million number is made up with absolutely zero evidence
102.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
Thank you, that gives me a better understanding.
103.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
I mean you can try to share child pornography through your ISP's network and we can see what happens? Shady stuff are mostly shared through decentralized networks and its the centralized www that's preventing them. To me this dece
104.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
So this whole anti china rhetoric had nothing to do with human rights or unfair trade but everything to do with the west not want to squander its middle life style because our planet can't actually support it. I appreciate your honest
105.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
I honestly do not understand this fetish with decentralization, do you really want a social network filled with child pornography, violence and other shady stuff? Because that's what's gonna happen guaranteed. People are just anim
106.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
So chinese people should just sit down and live low class life. Got it.
107.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
Well depends on what your motives are when you are reading china related news. Do you want an accurate depiction of that's actually going on or do you want to read stuff that reaffirms your bias. The actual article linked has provided
108.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
I'm sorry but Guo wen Gui is not a credible source. His past claims have repeatedly been debunked. Not to mention his deep ties with Steve bannon
109.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
Honestly can we not post stuff from radio free Asia on hacker News, this isn't Reddit
110.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
yes, isn't that the whole point of free speech?
111.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
The BBC link shows a leak without context. And with some balant mistranslations The ABC link shows a random video uploaded and verified as 'authentic' by someone who sits at his home watching Google maps. If that's the level
112.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
from what evidence? he said she said? because the data is showing no such thing. if you rather trust data than rhetoric.
113.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
remember Nayirah? how can i make sure this isn't another case of US falsifying testimony to justify it's own agenda?
114.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
The problem with these conspiracy theory is it stirs up the pre conceived notion that the big evil CCP can kidnap anyone, and people will generally remember it. but when Jack Ma eventually shows up there isn't going to be another story
115.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
do you have a problem accepting 1.3 billion refugees?
116.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
I love this analogy!
117.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
my understanding was they use russian engines because it's still more cost effective, so it's better for use in peace time for training purposes. but they do have domestic variants ready in case of actual war, where having things
118.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
Good observation, however I would point out that china is already there with military production capabilities. What china is trying to do now is enter consumer market where there is a lot of price sensitivity. That means things have to more
119.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
I think you nailed it, it's not about the Uyghurs, it's about not allowing china to continue its economic growth. Never mind that growth has had tremendous positive impact on average chinese citizens Uyghurs included.
120.
by hungryhobo 6y ago
I do like the author's point about understanding vs knowledge. Often I see the industry and their evangelists recycling old ideas as the new shiny thing with t-shirts and conferences, and it can feel daunting to keep up.

More ›