humansareok1

7 ms·

31.
by humansareok1 2y ago
Through a search space often large enough to be completely intractable with a galaxy wide computer.
32.
by humansareok1 2y ago
There's a lot of automated proof checkers out there. Presumably you would just run any solution from an AI through those.
33.
by humansareok1 2y ago
This is completely different from one lab running the same experiment 20 times and publishing the one positive result.
34.
by humansareok1 2y ago
>someone will eventually publish a false positive result without fraud. I think most people correctly intuit that this is actually a type of very pernicious fraud.
35.
by humansareok1 2y ago
How is this a spectrum. There is indeed a spectrum of p(doom)s which represent meaningful positions about risk and then there's e/acc's, a group of misanthropic weirdos who are actively interested in pursuing the extinction o
36.
by humansareok1 2y ago
>One other nice thing is that instead of restricted stock you get actual money. Stock at FAANG is basically equivalent to cash. You can sell it as soon as you get it.
37.
by humansareok1 2y ago
Wait til you learn how many people can't do simple percentages like 10% of 150 or how many people can't do basic arithmetic like 19+15.
38.
by humansareok1 2y ago
>what is being sold is not and cannot become smart in the way it's being sold by x-risk stans Do you have actual evidence for this astonishing take? Because I'm sure the entire field would be entranced by your genius here. It&#
39.
by humansareok1 2y ago
"I'm not smart enough to imagine how something might work therefore it's impossible"
40.
by humansareok1 2y ago
Of course but having an expectation of 100% reliability from AI when Humans aren't even close to that seems misguided.
41.
by humansareok1 2y ago
>There is nothing consistent about it. Apparently you haven't worked with many humans...
42.
by humansareok1 2y ago
> All the doom scenarios seem to rely on quasi-magical abilities springing from advanced intelligence The amount of people who dismiss doom risk with some version of "I'm not smart enough to imagine what something far smarter t
43.
by humansareok1 2y ago
These were pretty terrible. 10/10 if you've literally ever seen an AI generated image before. Totally not representative of the state of the art. In 5 years I doubt anyone but experts can tell by the naked eye in most cases.
44.
by humansareok1 2y ago
I think you are misunderstanding. These are typically mathematical tricks used for computation and don't lead to actual non-local interpretations of QM. I don't think any major work is done without standard QFT. I doubt you can fi
45.
by humansareok1 2y ago
The only theories not ruled out by Bell are non local. You have to accept such a mountain of nonsense for any non local theory to be valid that I don't think anyone takes them seriously.
46.
by humansareok1 2y ago
100% you're just adding additional volatility for higher returns. Backdate the strategy, doubtful you're beating the overall index on decade timescales.
47.
by humansareok1 2y ago
Has the World Index ever outperformed the SP500 over a 40-50 year span?
48.
by humansareok1 2y ago
Seems pretty obvious that their keeping their best returning strategies for employees rather than outside investors?
49.
by humansareok1 2y ago
Can you explain how it's fundamentally any different from retail investors just buying and holding the SP500 Index Companies' stocks individually?
50.
by humansareok1 2y ago
>The higher quality of the CUDA toolkit compared to other SIMD languages, combined with it's increasing relevance in compute (gaming, followed by blockchain, followed by ML, followed by GPT) would have made this an NVDA an easy pick
51.
by humansareok1 2y ago
I like this approach too. My primary investments in index funds continue to grow and I get just enough of a dopamine hit from smaller bets on Nvidia and Crypto that I don't get crushed by fomo and end up betting my mortgage on some far
52.
by humansareok1 2y ago
We've already invalidated hidden variable theories in Physics so I find it hard to believe consciousness has some separate class of hidden effects still undiscovered and allowable in our universe.
53.
by humansareok1 2y ago
Both are necessary but neither is sufficient.
54.
by humansareok1 2y ago
Go to like any large city and people sell knockoffs for cheap on the sidewalk.
55.
by humansareok1 2y ago
>although I don't recommend it to anyone (my health and well-being suffered) > I plan to keep up the pace for the next 1-2 years in order to reach principal. At what cost? You even admit this is damaging to your health and well-b
56.
by humansareok1 2y ago
I'd check your numbers on that from 30 years ago. They weren't even in the same universe of selectivity as they are now. Full-time/part-time is totally irrelevant. What, are you the most elitist credentialist of all time lol?
57.
by humansareok1 2y ago
And then he went to Stanford so hardly a failure...
58.
by humansareok1 2y ago
>Of course a memory cannot be _explicitly_ (like .mp4? lol) encoded in genetics. Indeed so the answer to the question: Can you inherit memories from your ancestors? Is No. Full stop. You want to talk about how the vibes during your grand
59.
by humansareok1 2y ago
Oh yeah so you want to explain how Epigenetics can transfer the memory of my Grandfathers 17th Birthday Party to my brain?
60.
by humansareok1 2y ago
Can memories be explicitly encoded in genes? If not then no. End of the story.

More ›