huhkerrf

16 ms·

271.
by huhkerrf 2y ago
Or a strange idea of how things are or how they should be: > In my experience, men don’t do group claps. We tend to shy away from on-tempo towel twirls. The weight room doesn’t break out in Woo!s when one of the fellas tries his best on
272.
by huhkerrf 2y ago
And how do you know it's accurate? By your own admission, you don't know enough to understand it via a Google search, how do you know it's not making up cases or interpretations like https://apnews.com/article
273.
by huhkerrf 2y ago
I want to be nice, but there is "write bad code" stupid, and then there is "pay for your business travel yourself" stupid. How did his manager never pull him aside and tell him to stop it?
274.
by huhkerrf 2y ago
The thing about Jobs is that he's become whoever you want him to be. If you believe yourself a visionary, he's the one to emulate. But, conversely, you can't visit Linkedin for a second without seeing the Jobs quote about hir
275.
by huhkerrf 2y ago
Oh hey, it's me! Don't get me wrong, I don't think I'm terrible at my work or anything, just slightly above average, while I'm a good order of magnitude better at interviews. I don't know why, I just love them
276.
by huhkerrf 2y ago
> I immediately went over to the sink and kicked out the lady who was pretending to work. I then washed all the dishes and left. OT, but I'm very jealous of people with this mindset and work ethic. I'm much too lazy to have don
277.
by huhkerrf 2y ago
I feel the same way. Anytime someone says they don't find LLMs all that useful, the exact same comments come out: "They clearly aren't using the right model!" "It's obvious they don't know how to prompt, o
278.
by huhkerrf 2y ago
That's the whole point. You can't say "OF COURSE" it means X, and then say, well, no, obviously it means different things to different people. The point here is that, it seems as if this group is only allowing a specific
279.
by huhkerrf 2y ago
You say "OF COURSE" but it doesn't take long to encounter the argument that racism is "prejudice plus power." It's a classic motte and bailey. I know what you're trying to imply with your comment, but agai
280.
by huhkerrf 2y ago
That's fair, but those two things shouldn't come into play at all. Just leave them out. Is this group saying that if you disagree with the idea that only white people can be racist that you can't be a contributor? I'm ho
281.
by huhkerrf 2y ago
> Defending “reverse racism” and “reverse sexism”, concepts not backed by empirical evidence, which could be seen as deliberate intimidation or creating an exclusionary environment. > Overloading the discussion of the bylaws change (4
282.
by huhkerrf 2y ago
That's funny, I've been much more inclined to use Coderpad since the sale. The creator's behaviour towards my colleagues when he would write in to get support was overly aggressive and borderline abusive, and I committed to n