hughhowey

4 ms·

1.
by hughhowey 2mo ago
Thanks! Everyone seems so nice.
2.
by hughhowey 2mo ago
That's how I meant it. Love to have read the original comment telling me about all the authors out there who are somehow able to avoid the AI that is now in EVERY SINGLE THING WE USE, including our email and web searches.
3.
by hughhowey 2mo ago
Capitalism and profit motive are human nature. It's also human nature to be irritated by your own reading comprehension (based on biases and assumptions you carry around daily) and then attribute that irritation onto a stranger instead
4.
by hughhowey 2mo ago
Did you even make it to the end of that sentence? It would've taken you less time than writing your comment. I said "at least as well enough to cause confusion and speculation" But apparently there's enough confusion to
5.
by hughhowey 2mo ago
I think about this a lot. For me, non-fiction stories hit way harder. I read a book about Amelia Earhart last month, and KNOWING it happened to a REAL HUMAN made the book 10x more powerful than a work of fiction about a lost pilot would fee
6.
by hughhowey 2mo ago
It will one day. For sure. I'd wager within the next ten years there will be a major controversy about an AI book winning a top prize in literature.
7.
by hughhowey 2mo ago
Thanks, Mike! Glad you're enjoying.
8.
by hughhowey 2mo ago
Human slop is right! Stealing that phrase. Thank you for it.
9.
by hughhowey 2mo ago
Reading comprehension is suffering these days.
10.
by hughhowey 2mo ago
I love your fourth version! That's the best plot twist. But I work in this industry, and for a bidding war to go 18 rounds (which is what's been said) and get an advance this high (it's a lot in the publishing world), some hu
11.
by hughhowey 2mo ago
The full sentence I wrote: "Artificial Intelligence is writing about as well as humans — at least well enough to cause confusion and speculation — and that’s creating an existential crisis among authors, confusion among readers, and le