hueving

27 ms·

211.
by hueving 8y ago
Agree that the md80s are noisy monsters, but really has very little overlap with customer satisfaction. <1% of Delta's customers are going to live close enough to an airport with Delta mad dog departures and even fewer of them will
212.
by hueving 8y ago
>I certainly don't think they're safe, but a much, much higher ratio of .com domains are A) actually used by our business, and B) legitimate. So what? It seems like you are confusing false positives with false negatives and usi
213.
by hueving 8y ago
If you're using domain tlds as a heuristic strong enough to make blocking decisions your users are going to get wrecked because you don't have a real method of detecting phishing/malware sites. Seriously, blacklisting tlds is
214.
by hueving 8y ago
>Because it makes using DNS filtering a pain. You're doing the internet wrong and I feel sorry for your users. A tld makes no difference when a request to a resource could be to gstatic.com or to gstatic.io unless you're doing
215.
by hueving 8y ago
>and large government debt (US anyone?) The comparison to the US is not apt because the US has control over its own currency. This is critical for high debt scenarios because it leaves the option of essentially printing money via a progr
216.
by hueving 8y ago
>it's meant to be used exclusively by the targeted group Impressive use of the passive voice to pretend that there is some central authority deciding how words are meant to be used. People don't agree on how words are meant to
217.
by hueving 8y ago
It's not a good analogy because it doesn't require individuals at the top of their field. The only reason Netflix is winning is because they have massive amounts of content and integration into many devices. Both of those are busi
218.
by hueving 8y ago
Is mowing your lawn cruel?
219.
by hueving 8y ago
Do you kill weeds or pick flowers? I can't fathom a stunted growth is somehow worse than killing a plant.
220.
by hueving 8y ago
That's a good pointer maybe for debate threads but it's not a good way to have a real conversation.
221.
by hueving 8y ago
A person wasn't even mentioned ...
222.
by hueving 8y ago
>As such, correcting the biases, conscious or not, that have led to the poor diversity of our communities, must be part of our mission. Free software can easily empower people that aren't part of the development community. There is
223.
by hueving 8y ago
What reminder? The OP threw out an awful no true Scotsman argument. Pro diversity programs in all of the big tech companies that specifically target diversity quotas are a blatant example.
224.
by hueving 8y ago
The fact that companies have programs targeting recruitment specifically to minorities says otherwise.
225.
by hueving 8y ago
>We're talking about politics, and I'm saying that Stripe should be ashamed of themselves. That's an inherently subjective and political claim. Right, and it's just an opinion you back with no reasoning using historic
226.
by hueving 8y ago
Percentages are "related in size".
227.
by hueving 8y ago
If it's inaccurate it's a failure or it won't be widely deployed. It's idiotic to make a perfect surveillance machine using the excuse that, if you don't, someone will make a crappy one. This is about it being an un
228.
by hueving 8y ago
Awful title. It's a projection that the US will drop that far in the future. It hasn't dropped that far as the clickbait implies.
229.
by hueving 8y ago
>- Discourage users visiting via the IP Address, adding that to favorites, sharing it, etc. Making it difficult/impossible to migrate That's not a reason to reject. That's a reason to issue a redirect. No regular user that
230.
by hueving 8y ago
People who criticize tone police are technically right that the content of an argument is what should matter, but that smacks of ignorance of how humans engage in conversation. If someone is screaming at me and ending every sentence with, &
231.
by hueving 8y ago
Open source has nothing to do with data. If you think open source people don't care about privacy you know nothing about open source. People want justice, but they also want individual liberties to not be violated. Particularly in the
232.
by hueving 8y ago
>Until you are a victim of a crime and facial recognition helps to find the perpetrator and you suddenly change your mind. Appeal to fear. Why is it you think that justification doesn't work for illegal search and seizure?
233.
by hueving 8y ago
Make up your mind, will the solution work if IBM makes it? If so, then it's not really low tech. If not, then Amazon staying out of the game did exactly the right thing because all of the capable people abstained.
234.
by hueving 8y ago
Do you know what a percentage is? Not only are taxes already proportionate to profit, but they are disproportionate larger for higher incomes in any progressive taxation scheme.
235.
by hueving 8y ago
Then I presume you're fine with switching to a toll based system where bridges/roads are funded by usage. You wear the road down every day,I am you pay every day. That's as fair as it gets. The notion that rich people simply
236.
by hueving 8y ago
They are well within reason to lobby against policies they see as more destructive to the business community than the claimed net benefit. If you want an example of why you can't whimsically tax businesses for whatever you want, look a
237.
by hueving 8y ago
Being tax deductible doesn't somehow make it profitable or even free. It just means that on a million dollar donation, it actually cost you something like $600k in the end. You're still down that money in every scenario. Nobody is
238.
by hueving 8y ago
Not in this case. Clearly Microsoft did fine without doing it .
239.
by hueving 8y ago
Not sure anyone actually thinks "open source" is a term owned by an organization and the gp didn't say they were restricting Mongo, so I'm not sure if your clarification is necessary. It's like someone claiming cert
240.
by hueving 8y ago
No penalty is not the same thing as a lower penalty. You don't go around saying people got a lower penalty that were never actually prosecuted for something. You claim the parent is speculating without basis but the parent is asking fo

More ›