hueving

35 ms·

361.
by hueving 8y ago
>That "cache server" is an example of feature-creep towards centralization. That's a tiresome slippery slope argument. "Better not install that proxy server or soon everyone will host all of their content on it instea
362.
by hueving 8y ago
Just because you use a centralized service to find podcasts doesn't mean all of us do.
363.
by hueving 8y ago
It's not criticism. It's reactionary conjecture about why people are using YouTube without any evidence to back it up.
364.
by hueving 8y ago
Gmail is free. Does that mean email service is not a product? Why does fastmail exist?
365.
by hueving 8y ago
Companies with deep pockets trying and failing to gain a meaningful share in a market is more proof of a monopoly or other anti-competitive behavior, not less.
366.
by hueving 8y ago
>Counterpoint: if these startups need a giant subsidized mapping product for free or else they aren't profitable, they weren't ever profitable. If startups need a giant subsidized operating system for free or else they weren&#x
367.
by hueving 8y ago
This is primarily a hijack detection framework with flexible operations on detection. How to actually "neutralize" the attack is up to the operator and there isn't really anything new offered in that regard from what I can te
368.
by hueving 8y ago
You're punishing the wrong people, why is that difficult to understand? The companies that operate grids are not the free riders. By having idiotic legislation that allows solar owners to free ride the grid, you only punished the utili
369.
by hueving 8y ago
Stop confusing batteries with wind/solar prices. Until the battery problem is fixed, overbuilding doesn't do jack because you have nowhere to store the bursts. Stop talking about wind and solar prices and just look at the price of
370.
by hueving 8y ago
Gullibility has little to do with 'education level'.
371.
by hueving 8y ago
Seriously, the more interesting news was the irrational exuberance leading up to today.
372.
by hueving 8y ago
You're thinking of options, not stock. Stock price itself can't imply volatility, it can only reflect market expectations of earnings.
373.
by hueving 8y ago
Except batteries aren't even close to where they need to be in costs to cover windless nights.
374.
by hueving 8y ago
OP is commending slack for their customer support for when you report an issue with slack itself. Nothing to do with what the products are.
375.
by hueving 8y ago
Where does it show they are doing step 6? That seems to be critical to your thesis of this being a pump and dump.
376.
by hueving 8y ago
There exists entire industries of market analysts to give you things like TAM and other critical information to avoid creating a solution to problems nobody has.
377.
by hueving 8y ago
If you had an idea to improve on the telegraph that makes it 15% faster for operators, would you start a telegraph business right now? Why or why not?
378.
by hueving 8y ago
Dam
379.
by hueving 8y ago
Other than a change in 'economic conditions', the rest of those issues can be avoided with adequate business research. Just because most technologists don't doesn't mean it's actually such an unknown.
380.
by hueving 8y ago
>heavily subsidize fossil fuels by not raising any tax on gas. Unless they are taxing solar, that's not a subsidy when comparing the two. Where fossil fuels are subsidized is in the externalities they don't pay for (i.e. enviro
381.
by hueving 8y ago
From some externality to society perspective, sure. But that's definitely not true of a grid operation cost perspective. A coal power plant does not get paid retail rates for the power it generates. The utility company charges more pre
382.
by hueving 8y ago
>If the solar was ruining the grid or was way more expensive than what it seems, we would not keep seeing solar installed at this pace and at these costs. This completely ignores the fact that the people buying solar get subsidies and th
383.
by hueving 8y ago
Not for solar. There are no grids nearly large enough to have half in the day time and half in the night time on average.
384.
by hueving 8y ago
Great recession
385.
by hueving 8y ago
Careful, because of nat that's also a way to ban potential legit users.
386.
by hueving 8y ago
Double-voting is only one thing people are paranoid about. The other is the 12 million possible votes from undocumented (a.k.a illegal) immigrants.
387.
by hueving 8y ago
>seeing as how passive investing has been essentially proven to be the better strategy for 99.9% of people You might want to look into that. It hasn't been proven at all unless you were thinking of investing in a fund of hedge funds
388.
by hueving 8y ago
Your suggestion is to make it illegal to sell a security at a specific price?
389.
by hueving 8y ago
Perceived momentum? I think your idea of HFT strategies might be pretty far off the mark. Guessing that the market will continue to go up or down (a.k.a 'perceived momentum') is just a gambling strategy used by day traders. There
390.
by hueving 8y ago
>How much of that talent would be better allocated to basic research and discovery? Probably very little. In my experience, there is limited overlap between interest in basic research and interest in making things with immediate use. Peo

More ›