html5iscancer

4 ms·

1.
by html5iscancer 15y ago
Please at least reply if you down vote. I would like to know what I'm mistaken about.
2.
by html5iscancer 15y ago
Why down vote? Web babies seem to get very upset when the abject technological failure of the browser is pointed out to them. It has failed comprehensively: 1) security 2) computational performance 3) flexibility WebSockets for example are
3.
by html5iscancer 15y ago
Zero-install is not difficult. In fact, it was around decades ago. Then people destroyed that with complex operating systems requiring loads of configuration. Even with the stupidity of modern operating systems we could recover zero-install
4.
by html5iscancer 15y ago
Sockets are not a new technology. Wrapping sockets in a bunch of overhead and taking away UDP isn't new technology. No smooth scrolling on a PC with a graphics card an inch thick strikes me as a very poor job. But it will be hailed as a "st
5.
by html5iscancer 15y ago
Not trying to bully you, but what part of this is impressive? There doesn't seem to be anything here that wasn't done better decades ago. Why does everything become impressive once it appears in the browser?
6.
by html5iscancer 15y ago
Please, stop doing things like this. You people are destroying programming! Why does everything have to be so complicated? Because people keep fucking everything up with stupidity, that's why!
7.
by html5iscancer 15y ago
The scrolling was jerky for me on my newish desktop PC. There doesn't seem to be any new "technology" here, just some slow wrappers around stuff that was around years ago. If this is being touted as "the future" then programming is really g