Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hshshshshsh
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
You cannot measure consciousness. You are consciousness thinking of itself as the human. Measurement is an event appearing in consciousness done by humans. It's like persons inside GTA talking about measuring the Samsung monitor. It m
62.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
Are we both talking about the same thing? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness
63.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
Why do you think God will have a name? Name is used by humans to identity a person among a lot of other persons. Why will God have a name if it is the only thing in existence? To answer the question of why humans give name to God. It's
64.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
Yes. Self awareness is just another content inside consciousness.
65.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
Yes. The man can never see consciousness. Only consciousness can see man.
66.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
Life is one omnipotent being. It's just ego, thoughts and social identity that creates the illusion of multiple beings. But ego and names are made up. Separation just thoughts. The more life believes in thoughts it becomes divided. But
67.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
You cannot define consciousness. You can only experience it. In fact consciousness is the only thing you will ever experience.
68.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
Am omnipotent being is a necessity for making observations. A lot of religions considers consciousness as God.
69.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
Big bang theory no longer excites me. As long as we can't explain consciousness all these theories are pointless. All theories mere appearances in consciousness including the universe and everything we experience. Consciousness has the
70.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
Assume God exists. Various isolated cultures are going to come up with different names for God. This like saying which Sun? Surya, Ra or Helios? All are different names of sun. But there is only one sun.
71.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
Do humans reproduce. Yes. Is life full of suffering. Yes. Is life full of joy. Yes All are true.
72.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
Are you able to sustain that? Or was this one off experiences?
73.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
How do I be free? I have tasted the freedom for a short time but I can't sustain it. A new ego has been formed after seeing through the old ego. And it also claims to be free of ego.
74.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
That's just your ego talking. The human race will be just fine with or without you raising kids. Our great great ancestor monkeys and fishes didn't raise their children to push their species to centuries further. They just existed
75.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
Family like any other material possessions is just another building block for the ego. Trying to believe you own something or is something when nothing is permanent and everything is part of everything else.
76.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
It's also selfish to bring humans that goes through immense suffering in their life so that you get meaning out of life or get joy from kids.
77.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
That's a long chain of suffering you are creating. What do you do with that length?
78.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
You can act without belief in meaning. Trees and Earth for example works just fine.
79.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
Shouldn't you be on LinkedIn?
80.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
> This is especially true for friendly, competent, reasonable-seeming managers – people want to commiserate with winners Interesting. My experience working inside big tech was thinking of managers as mostly losers who are neither technic
81.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
That's fair. Never thought about it that way.
82.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
> Heaven's Gate mass suicide was a bad idea (and its justification was patently wrong: no soul was uploaded into the mothership) From your POV and mine yes. From their POV no. Clearly that's why they did it. I agree what they d
83.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
> dominant strategies. This is an objective truth, and exercising the dominant strategy is objectively better than not. From your POV people play to dominate and it's objective for you. But that's not the case for everyone. Som
84.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
> Simply because someone believes something does not move the phenomenon to the subjective realm. From your POV yes. From their POV no.
85.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
I never claimed mine was a good or bad idea.
86.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
Whatever criteria you are using to justify it's a good idea is your own subjective criteria. There is no good idea function cooked in reality which is objective across every observer.
87.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
Because there is no objective way to say whether something is a good idea or bad idea. It's always subjective.
88.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
There are no objectives. Just conditioned patterns one adapt to survive childhood.
89.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
Capable of making any arguments than name calling?
90.
▲
by
hshshshshsh
1y ago
You got triggered because I said memorizing something doesn't make one smart. And called me an asshole. You also said reading stuff in English give you less satisfaction than reading in Japanese. You might want to reflect on why that i
More ›