hparadiz

14 ms·

421.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
When I encounter people who don't use these tools it feels more like talking to someone without a computer who is trying to convince you that you don't need one back in the 90s. Or someone being like "the internet is useless&
422.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
Setting aside code examples from the internets for a moment. I have seen entire multi million dollar operations running off the most horrible PHP spaghetti nonsense. The base line is far below any floor you are thinking of.
423.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
So tldr you don't have it now and have no frame of reference.
424.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
My total usage for this month is less than one days pay.
425.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
Most code we write is boiler plate nonsense. Writing out React components manually doesn't make me better at writing C. Like it literally is a waste of my time. I could be focusing on "real problems" like the way light diffus
426.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
I'm usually compiling other people's code. Hitting that 1 in 100,000 issue in run time and then having to come up with patch. And then have to make sure it's okay in arm and amd64. The bug I'm thinking of is decidedly a
427.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
My lived experience over the past few months is proving you wrong. I started with your position and have since been able to see how good the tools are when properly used. I've also noticed a huge gap in ability among engineers and I th
428.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
I literally do packaging for a living and you are misunderstanding my point. Most people just take a binary and run it. There's no analysis of the assembly code. You might profile it and bench it after the fact but no one is sitting th
429.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
SO was just an example. If you try to tell me you've never copied/pasted code before I know you are lying.
430.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
I'm sure they were blindly accepting the Assembly coming out of the compiler.
431.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
As opposed to the old days when people would just blindly copy/paste random shit from Stackoverflow? Ya'll need to stop with this cope. It's not a good look.
432.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
It's a nudge. Like "update your OS". You could also just be logging into a machine after a few weeks away. The software tells you what you need to update before letting you in.
433.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
Kolide admin provides a web UI for osquery so you can query things. It allows remote osquery queries but not remote code execution. You generally pair it with CrowdStrike Falcon. Kolide does a spot check like "is falcon sensor running&
434.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
Oh this duplicate post again. SpaceX stock may as well be bonds on space flight. I'd buy them at a loss.
435.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
Wanna explain to me why a robot never took this photo? https://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/fd02_for-pao/
436.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
I still do all my work on an M1 MBP ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
437.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
I don't really need USB-C displays or Thunderbolt for my use case. The touch ID is easily replaced with a Yubikey. Everything else just works. What is the problem?
438.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
Yup. That gets us to the stone age on the moon. I'm a big fan of bootstrapping the moon's industrial capacity straight to the industrial age. We need not only concrete production but also steel, water, etc. The faster we bootstrap
439.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
I think it's a feasible option I just can't use it for work because here's how that goes: > "Hey can you remove MDM from this Macbook so I can install Linux?" No. > "Hey can I get a linux laptop for a har
440.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
You can do that but it would require a track that is tens of kilometers long along with a magnetic levitation technology. My suggestion is something we can do right now with a basic landing strip. But yes a meglev is the end game. Needs to
441.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
You could land at 500 km/h on wheels and use breaks to stop. This makes it much safer and lowers how much propellant you need to bring to the moon by a lot. Similarly it makes getting back into lunar orbit much safer and easier because
442.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
Using Google’s own IPO S-1 / SEC filings: Year Revenue Net income / loss 1998 Not reported 1999 $220k -$6.076M 2000 $19.108M -$14.690M Do you guys not know what a loss lead is?
443.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
https://old.reddit.com/r/EconomicHistory/comments/zynvvq/who... Their names are known and are part of history now. Maybe not famous but certainly better than being a forgotten weathered tomb stone after
444.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
I think it's undervalued.
445.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
I buy 50 billion of hardware. Make 45 billion back in year 1. My losses are 5 billion. I Pay of all my creditors by year two. Then spend another 55 billion on hardware in the second half of year two. My profit is at this point zero. <you
446.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
The current SpaceX is in a far better financial and operational position than 10 years ago. By an order of magnitude. 90% of all payload to orbit right now is SpaceX alone. Starlink is profitable all on it's own. Right now. And they ar
447.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
Imagine not wanting to own a piece of the first company to make a re-usable orbital class booster.
448.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
Been thinking about this quite a bit. I think every lunar airlock will end up with a wash station and will end up using basic water sprays to get the job done. Soil compactors can be used outside to compact the dust and prevent it from bein
449.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
Because it's better for Earth's biosphere to mine things like lithium on the moon rather than polluting our biosphere. The North and South pole of the moon also serves as an excellent staging ground to put solar energy collectors
450.
by hparadiz 5mo ago
These days corporate security treats these workstations like a dummy terminal. No secrets live on the workstation. You have to re-auth with sso constantly with biometrics and are basically editing data that is in a cloud. So the risk to a c

More ›