howcan

3 ms·

1.
by howcan 14y ago
It just seemed like a very extreme example to use to illustrate conspiracy. That's all. You're not the only one I've seen draw such extreme examples. I am being argumentative. But that's only because I think there's an argument worth mak
2.
by howcan 14y ago
Interesting comment. PR may see social media as a threat, for exactly the reason you've mentioned. "Well-informed" is relative I think to what you're doing. For example, someone doing hard science research in a lab may only need access t
3.
by howcan 14y ago
My comment is not to do with TPB. My comment has to do with mixing legal principles (or more specifcally, areas of law) that are very different and do not mix well. I disagree that "the same legal principle" applies, but then I'm not sure
4.
by howcan 14y ago
No, I think I understand the OP. That's why I said "I do not mean to disagree..." Did you catch that part? I'm simply pointing out that for some people the news is very valuable to what they do. As you say, for the OP it might not have a
5.
by howcan 14y ago
I do not mean to disagree with the OP, but here's a thought: What would happen if we required someone like Warren Buffet to ignore the news? What if he was prohibited from reading a single newspaper? What would happen? I know many people wh
6.
by howcan 14y ago
How can you make the jump from 1. copyright infringment, mainly a civil offense, that addresses speculatve monetary losses to 2. conspiracy to commit murder, a criminal offense with a history hundreds of years older than the notion of "copy