hooande

8 ms·

31.
by hooande 3y ago
Just use a machine learning method other than an LLM. If you're going to go to the effort of fine tuning and training, pay people to collect and label data like we used to do before Feb 2023. If your main concern is question answering
32.
by hooande 3y ago
What you described is known as "sequence-to-sequence learning", or seq2seq. Google it or ask ChatGPT. It's a very common NLP technique that can do almost everything you mentioned. Of course the utility will depend on the trai
33.
by hooande 3y ago
If we didn't value humans more than other things we wouldn't have survived as a species. You can argue over terminology, but you can't beat evolution. I'd imagine that you'd prioritize saving a human child from a fi
34.
by hooande 4y ago
The concerns of AI pessimists are simply not real. They are thought experiments and hypotheticals about a technology that does not exist and is vaguely defined. There are concerns about every form of technology. Nuclear energy. Plastics. On
35.
by hooande 4y ago
This is massively overstated. The major costs of being a spammer are creating new accounts and staying off blacklists. Carrying on conversations or creating content are marginal costs, at best. LLMs are no more valuable to a large spam oper
36.
by hooande 4y ago
> In the next 10 years, AI/robots will generate wealth at an unprecedented scale. Would love to see the reasoning behind this. Nothing I've seen about LLMs makes me think they will produce any kind of bounty for anyone.
37.
by hooande 4y ago
This has nothing to do with ChatGPT. An api end point will be just as vulnerable if it's called from any application. There's nothing special about an LLM interface that will make this more or less likely. It sounds like you'
38.
by hooande 4y ago
> "As of a few minutes ago, we had received 576 submissions and processed 474 of them. 93 have resulted in bans and 7 have been marked as suspicious (a new category meaning they might have used those tools)." I've had many
39.
by hooande 4y ago
We live in a world that's dominated by staring at screens. You're doing it right now. This wasn't true when I was young. The world changed. It stands to reason that the education system should also change to reflect the world
40.
by hooande 4y ago
contact me at the email in my profile
41.
by hooande 4y ago
Yes. It still can't attend meetings, collaborate on projects or set priorities. Or any of the other things programmers spend most of their time doing. Also I'd guess that it still generally sucks at programming. Code has a lot of
42.
by hooande 4y ago
I've seen that it can also generate 25k words. That's about 30-40% of the average novel
43.
by hooande 4y ago
After watching the demos I'm convinced that the new context length will have the biggest impact. The ability to dump 32k tokens into a prompt (25,000 words) seems like it will drastically expand the reasoning capability and number of u
44.
by hooande 4y ago
I do this. It works.
45.
by hooande 4y ago
There's a lot of talk about AGI, or whether GPT is valuable or not based on its tendency to be confidently incorrect. I think this misses the point made by cs702: GPT is a machine learning model that is available to anyone, with no kno
46.
by hooande 4y ago
A Large Language Model is a tool and people have to learn to use it, just like any other tool. I have used GPT as a machine learning model in a way similar to the grandparent comment, and I now have some understanding of when and why it hal
47.
by hooande 4y ago
> Please stop assuming anything it says it true. This is overstated and easily disproved. ChatGPT produces accurate facts as a matter of course. test it right now: "How tall is the Statue of Liberty?", "In what state was A
48.
by hooande 4y ago
You're still sending the data to OpenAI in the prompts. That's sending arbitrary text from my corporate slack to a 3rd party. Where you host my data before you send it to wherever isn't relevant. Also, "We host with AWS&
49.
by hooande 4y ago
> This is systems theory 101: you can't fix systems that you can't understand. If the "actual machine learning practitioners" can break down behavior to the neuron level, then I'd say they understand it to some d
50.
by hooande 4y ago
There's a difference between a software bug and a probabilistic decision. A bug is by definition unintended behavior. With decision making ("is this comment spam or not?") it's understood that there will be errors and th
51.
by hooande 4y ago
This is better than I thought it would be. If you're skeptical, give it a try. I am curious about whether it hallucinates api methods that don't exist, like ChatGPT does. I haven't seen that yet but the underlying concept of
52.
by hooande 4y ago
"Neural networks are bad because some times they fail" is a low brow dismissal, indeed. What matters is the percentage accuracy. A black box with a 10% failure rate is better than a fully explainable system that fails 20% of the t
53.
by hooande 4y ago
Do not send me a ChatGPT generated email. I will assume that whatever you want, it wasn't worth the time for you to write less than a paragraph. Not to mention that you felt the email only needed to meet the lowest standard of average
54.
by hooande 4y ago
Google could do this now. They already have your calendar and your contacts. Do you think that a conversational interface was what was holding them back? Thousands of engineers, but if only they could figure out how to merge Gmail and Eliza
55.
by hooande 4y ago
four more kills and the pilot becomes an ace?
56.
by hooande 4y ago
You're flat out incorrect about this. GPT loves to say that it doesn't know things. Have you actually used it? Don't take my word for it. Ask it: "How many people are wearing tennis shoes in the United States right now
57.
by hooande 4y ago
what exactly do you think its going to make up? "The Hybrid Synergy Drive runs on apples and fairy dust"? I doubt that OP wants to build one of the engines, they just want a concise explanation. I've seen gpt hallucinate all
58.
by hooande 4y ago
Seems like the recommendations are somewhat hit or miss so far. I would suggest finding a way to say why it recommended a particular song. I know that this is already common, but maybe you could come up with a new spin on it. Also, other
59.
by hooande 4y ago
do you find that ChatGPT is useful for the search terms that are most valuable to your customers?
60.
by hooande 4y ago
I find it fascinating that so many people have such an interest in making a bot say something racist. this thing is a very powerful tool. and the best use they can come up with is "make it be racist"?

More ›