hoistor

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by hoistor 11y ago

   Am I missing something obvious here? Is it a GPL violation to create a separate .deb which includes only the binary kernel module for zfs which can be simply apt-get'd? Or are canonical planning on including the zfs code in the base &#
2. 2.▲
   by hoistor 11y ago

   I don't think the author of this post really understands ZFS. Is that a 4 disk mirror? You'd be much faster using a raid10 there. ZFS 'cache' devices are't for write cache either, you'd want a log device for wr
3. 3.▲
   by hoistor 11y ago

   I used SXCE, OpenSolaris and finally SmartOS for a while after the death, and unfortunately the benefits just werent' really there any more. I also hit some pretty nasty performance issues storage wise on my OVH gear (some interrupt re
4. 4.▲
   by hoistor 11y ago

   Disappointing really, but I think it's unlikely to make it upstream. Perhaps I've missed some of the advantages to taking this approach though.. Or .. any of them? I'd be completely onboard with SMF replacing the init system
5. 5.▲
   by hoistor 12y ago

   Aaand japanese translations ???
6. 6.▲
   by hoistor 12y ago

   Yes. :/